Commit b1c2f631 authored by Dima Chumak's avatar Dima Chumak Committed by Saeed Mahameed

net/mlx5e: Fix nullptr in mlx5e_hairpin_get_mdev()

The result of __dev_get_by_index() is not checked for NULL and then gets
dereferenced immediately.

Also, __dev_get_by_index() must be called while holding either RTNL lock
or @dev_base_lock, which isn't satisfied by mlx5e_hairpin_get_mdev() or
its callers. This makes the underlying hlist_for_each_entry() loop not
safe, and can have adverse effects in itself.

Fix by using dev_get_by_index() and handling nullptr return value when
ifindex device is not found. Update mlx5e_hairpin_get_mdev() callers to
check for possible PTR_ERR() result.

Fixes: 77ab67b7 ("net/mlx5e: Basic setup of hairpin object")
Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return value")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDima Chumak <dchumak@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRoi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
parent 7f331bf0
...@@ -452,12 +452,32 @@ static void mlx5e_detach_mod_hdr(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, ...@@ -452,12 +452,32 @@ static void mlx5e_detach_mod_hdr(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
static static
struct mlx5_core_dev *mlx5e_hairpin_get_mdev(struct net *net, int ifindex) struct mlx5_core_dev *mlx5e_hairpin_get_mdev(struct net *net, int ifindex)
{ {
struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev;
struct net_device *netdev; struct net_device *netdev;
struct mlx5e_priv *priv; struct mlx5e_priv *priv;
netdev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex); netdev = dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
if (!netdev)
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
priv = netdev_priv(netdev); priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
return priv->mdev; mdev = priv->mdev;
dev_put(netdev);
/* Mirred tc action holds a refcount on the ifindex net_device (see
* net/sched/act_mirred.c:tcf_mirred_get_dev). So, it's okay to continue using mdev
* after dev_put(netdev), while we're in the context of adding a tc flow.
*
* The mdev pointer corresponds to the peer/out net_device of a hairpin. It is then
* stored in a hairpin object, which exists until all flows, that refer to it, get
* removed.
*
* On the other hand, after a hairpin object has been created, the peer net_device may
* be removed/unbound while there are still some hairpin flows that are using it. This
* case is handled by mlx5e_tc_hairpin_update_dead_peer, which is hooked to
* NETDEV_UNREGISTER event of the peer net_device.
*/
return mdev;
} }
static int mlx5e_hairpin_create_transport(struct mlx5e_hairpin *hp) static int mlx5e_hairpin_create_transport(struct mlx5e_hairpin *hp)
...@@ -666,6 +686,10 @@ mlx5e_hairpin_create(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5_hairpin_params *params ...@@ -666,6 +686,10 @@ mlx5e_hairpin_create(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5_hairpin_params *params
func_mdev = priv->mdev; func_mdev = priv->mdev;
peer_mdev = mlx5e_hairpin_get_mdev(dev_net(priv->netdev), peer_ifindex); peer_mdev = mlx5e_hairpin_get_mdev(dev_net(priv->netdev), peer_ifindex);
if (IS_ERR(peer_mdev)) {
err = PTR_ERR(peer_mdev);
goto create_pair_err;
}
pair = mlx5_core_hairpin_create(func_mdev, peer_mdev, params); pair = mlx5_core_hairpin_create(func_mdev, peer_mdev, params);
if (IS_ERR(pair)) { if (IS_ERR(pair)) {
...@@ -804,6 +828,11 @@ static int mlx5e_hairpin_flow_add(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, ...@@ -804,6 +828,11 @@ static int mlx5e_hairpin_flow_add(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
int err; int err;
peer_mdev = mlx5e_hairpin_get_mdev(dev_net(priv->netdev), peer_ifindex); peer_mdev = mlx5e_hairpin_get_mdev(dev_net(priv->netdev), peer_ifindex);
if (IS_ERR(peer_mdev)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "invalid ifindex of mirred device");
return PTR_ERR(peer_mdev);
}
if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(priv->mdev, hairpin) || !MLX5_CAP_GEN(peer_mdev, hairpin)) { if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(priv->mdev, hairpin) || !MLX5_CAP_GEN(peer_mdev, hairpin)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "hairpin is not supported"); NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "hairpin is not supported");
return -EOPNOTSUPP; return -EOPNOTSUPP;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment