Commit b29a2acd authored by Roman Kagan's avatar Roman Kagan Committed by Sean Christopherson

KVM: x86/pmu: Truncate counter value to allowed width on write

Performance counters are defined to have width less than 64 bits.  The
vPMU code maintains the counters in u64 variables but assumes the value
to fit within the defined width.  However, for Intel non-full-width
counters (MSR_IA32_PERFCTRx) the value receieved from the guest is
truncated to 32 bits and then sign-extended to full 64 bits.  If a
negative value is set, it's sign-extended to 64 bits, but then in
kvm_pmu_incr_counter() it's incremented, truncated, and compared to the
previous value for overflow detection.

That previous value is not truncated, so it always evaluates bigger than
the truncated new one, and a PMI is injected.  If the PMI handler writes
a negative counter value itself, the vCPU never quits the PMI loop.

Turns out that Linux PMI handler actually does write the counter with
the value just read with RDPMC, so when no full-width support is exposed
via MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, and the guest initializes the counter to
a negative value, it locks up.

This has been observed in the field, for example, when the guest configures
atop to use perfevents and runs two instances of it simultaneously.

To address the problem, maintain the invariant that the counter value
always fits in the defined bit width, by truncating the received value
in the respective set_msr methods.  For better readability, factor the
out into a helper function, pmc_write_counter(), shared by vmx and svm
parts.

Fixes: 9cd803d4 ("KVM: x86: Update vPMCs when retiring instructions")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarRoman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230504120042.785651-1-rkagan@amazon.deTested-by: default avatarLike Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
[sean: tweak changelog, s/set/write in the helper]
Signed-off-by: default avatarSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
parent 5804c19b
......@@ -74,6 +74,12 @@ static inline u64 pmc_read_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
return counter & pmc_bitmask(pmc);
}
static inline void pmc_write_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 val)
{
pmc->counter += val - pmc_read_counter(pmc);
pmc->counter &= pmc_bitmask(pmc);
}
static inline void pmc_release_perf_event(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
if (pmc->perf_event) {
......
......@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static int amd_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
/* MSR_PERFCTRn */
pmc = get_gp_pmc_amd(pmu, msr, PMU_TYPE_COUNTER);
if (pmc) {
pmc->counter += data - pmc_read_counter(pmc);
pmc_write_counter(pmc, data);
pmc_update_sample_period(pmc);
return 0;
}
......
......@@ -436,11 +436,11 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
!(msr & MSR_PMC_FULL_WIDTH_BIT))
data = (s64)(s32)data;
pmc->counter += data - pmc_read_counter(pmc);
pmc_write_counter(pmc, data);
pmc_update_sample_period(pmc);
break;
} else if ((pmc = get_fixed_pmc(pmu, msr))) {
pmc->counter += data - pmc_read_counter(pmc);
pmc_write_counter(pmc, data);
pmc_update_sample_period(pmc);
break;
} else if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0))) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment