Commit b3998b3b authored by Ritesh Harjani's avatar Ritesh Harjani Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: improve fast_commit performance and scalability

Currently ext4_fc_commit_dentry_updates() is of quadratic time
complexity, which is causing performance bottlenecks with high
threads/file/dir count with fs_mark.

This patch makes commit dentry updates (and hence ext4_fc_commit()) path
to linear time complexity. Hence improves the performance of workloads
which does fsync on multiple threads/open files one-by-one.

Absolute numbers in avg file creates per sec (from fs_mark in 1K order)
=======================================================================
no.     Order   without-patch(K)   with-patch(K)   Diff(%)
1       1        16.90              17.51           +3.60
2       2,2      32.08              31.80           -0.87
3       3,3      53.97              55.01           +1.92
4       4,4      78.94              76.90           -2.58
5       5,5      95.82              95.37           -0.46
6       6,6      87.92              103.38          +17.58
7       6,10      0.73              126.13          +17178.08
8       6,14      2.33              143.19          +6045.49

workload type
==============
For e.g. 7th row order of 6,10 (2^6 == 64 && 2^10 == 1024)
echo /run/riteshh/mnt/{1..64} |sed -E 's/[[:space:]]+/ -d /g' \
  | xargs -I {} bash -c "sudo fs_mark -L 100 -D 1024 -n 1024 -s0 -S5 -d {}"

Perf profile
(w/o patches)
=============================
87.15%  [kernel]  [k] ext4_fc_commit           --> Heavy contention/bottleneck
 1.98%  [kernel]  [k] perf_event_interrupt
 0.96%  [kernel]  [k] power_pmu_enable
 0.91%  [kernel]  [k] update_sd_lb_stats.constprop.0
 0.67%  [kernel]  [k] ktime_get
Signed-off-by: default avatarRitesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarHarshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/930f35d4fd5f83e2673c868781d9ebf15e91bf4e.1645426817.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
parent 8c91c579
......@@ -1046,6 +1046,8 @@ struct ext4_inode_info {
/* Fast commit related info */
/* For tracking dentry create updates */
struct list_head i_fc_dilist;
struct list_head i_fc_list; /*
* inodes that need fast commit
* protected by sbi->s_fc_lock.
......
......@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ void ext4_fc_init_inode(struct inode *inode)
ext4_fc_reset_inode(inode);
ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_fc_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_fc_dilist);
init_waitqueue_head(&ei->i_fc_wait);
atomic_set(&ei->i_fc_updates, 0);
}
......@@ -279,6 +280,8 @@ void ext4_fc_stop_update(struct inode *inode)
void ext4_fc_del(struct inode *inode)
{
struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb);
struct ext4_fc_dentry_update *fc_dentry;
if (!test_opt2(inode->i_sb, JOURNAL_FAST_COMMIT) ||
(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY))
......@@ -286,7 +289,7 @@ void ext4_fc_del(struct inode *inode)
restart:
spin_lock(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_fc_lock);
if (list_empty(&ei->i_fc_list)) {
if (list_empty(&ei->i_fc_list) && list_empty(&ei->i_fc_dilist)) {
spin_unlock(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_fc_lock);
return;
}
......@@ -295,8 +298,33 @@ void ext4_fc_del(struct inode *inode)
ext4_fc_wait_committing_inode(inode);
goto restart;
}
list_del_init(&ei->i_fc_list);
spin_unlock(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_fc_lock);
if (!list_empty(&ei->i_fc_list))
list_del_init(&ei->i_fc_list);
/*
* Since this inode is getting removed, let's also remove all FC
* dentry create references, since it is not needed to log it anyways.
*/
if (list_empty(&ei->i_fc_dilist)) {
spin_unlock(&sbi->s_fc_lock);
return;
}
fc_dentry = list_first_entry(&ei->i_fc_dilist, struct ext4_fc_dentry_update, fcd_dilist);
WARN_ON(fc_dentry->fcd_op != EXT4_FC_TAG_CREAT);
list_del_init(&fc_dentry->fcd_list);
list_del_init(&fc_dentry->fcd_dilist);
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&ei->i_fc_dilist));
spin_unlock(&sbi->s_fc_lock);
if (fc_dentry->fcd_name.name &&
fc_dentry->fcd_name.len > DNAME_INLINE_LEN)
kfree(fc_dentry->fcd_name.name);
kmem_cache_free(ext4_fc_dentry_cachep, fc_dentry);
return;
}
/*
......@@ -427,7 +455,7 @@ static int __track_dentry_update(struct inode *inode, void *arg, bool update)
node->fcd_name.name = node->fcd_iname;
}
node->fcd_name.len = dentry->d_name.len;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->fcd_dilist);
spin_lock(&sbi->s_fc_lock);
if (sbi->s_journal->j_flags & JBD2_FULL_COMMIT_ONGOING ||
sbi->s_journal->j_flags & JBD2_FAST_COMMIT_ONGOING)
......@@ -435,6 +463,20 @@ static int __track_dentry_update(struct inode *inode, void *arg, bool update)
&sbi->s_fc_dentry_q[FC_Q_STAGING]);
else
list_add_tail(&node->fcd_list, &sbi->s_fc_dentry_q[FC_Q_MAIN]);
/*
* This helps us keep a track of all fc_dentry updates which is part of
* this ext4 inode. So in case the inode is getting unlinked, before
* even we get a chance to fsync, we could remove all fc_dentry
* references while evicting the inode in ext4_fc_del().
* Also with this, we don't need to loop over all the inodes in
* sbi->s_fc_q to get the corresponding inode in
* ext4_fc_commit_dentry_updates().
*/
if (dentry_update->op == EXT4_FC_TAG_CREAT) {
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&ei->i_fc_dilist));
list_add_tail(&node->fcd_dilist, &ei->i_fc_dilist);
}
spin_unlock(&sbi->s_fc_lock);
mutex_lock(&ei->i_fc_lock);
......@@ -954,7 +996,7 @@ __releases(&sbi->s_fc_lock)
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
struct ext4_fc_dentry_update *fc_dentry, *fc_dentry_n;
struct inode *inode;
struct ext4_inode_info *ei, *ei_n;
struct ext4_inode_info *ei;
int ret;
if (list_empty(&sbi->s_fc_dentry_q[FC_Q_MAIN]))
......@@ -970,21 +1012,16 @@ __releases(&sbi->s_fc_lock)
spin_lock(&sbi->s_fc_lock);
continue;
}
inode = NULL;
list_for_each_entry_safe(ei, ei_n, &sbi->s_fc_q[FC_Q_MAIN],
i_fc_list) {
if (ei->vfs_inode.i_ino == fc_dentry->fcd_ino) {
inode = &ei->vfs_inode;
break;
}
}
/*
* If we don't find inode in our list, then it was deleted,
* in which case, we don't need to record it's create tag.
* With fcd_dilist we need not loop in sbi->s_fc_q to get the
* corresponding inode pointer
*/
if (!inode)
continue;
WARN_ON(list_empty(&fc_dentry->fcd_dilist));
ei = list_first_entry(&fc_dentry->fcd_dilist,
struct ext4_inode_info, i_fc_dilist);
inode = &ei->vfs_inode;
WARN_ON(inode->i_ino != fc_dentry->fcd_ino);
spin_unlock(&sbi->s_fc_lock);
/*
......@@ -1228,6 +1265,7 @@ static void ext4_fc_cleanup(journal_t *journal, int full, tid_t tid)
struct ext4_fc_dentry_update,
fcd_list);
list_del_init(&fc_dentry->fcd_list);
list_del_init(&fc_dentry->fcd_dilist);
spin_unlock(&sbi->s_fc_lock);
if (fc_dentry->fcd_name.name &&
......
......@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ struct ext4_fc_dentry_update {
struct qstr fcd_name; /* Dirent name */
unsigned char fcd_iname[DNAME_INLINE_LEN]; /* Dirent name string */
struct list_head fcd_list;
struct list_head fcd_dilist;
};
struct ext4_fc_stats {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment