Commit b39a934e authored by David Howells's avatar David Howells Committed by David S. Miller

rxrpc: Fix service call disconnection

The recent patch that substituted a flag on an rxrpc_call for the
connection pointer being NULL as an indication that a call was disconnected
puts the set_bit in the wrong place for service calls.  This is only a
problem if a call is implicitly terminated by a new call coming in on the
same connection channel instead of a terminating ACK packet.

In such a case, rxrpc_input_implicit_end_call() calls
__rxrpc_disconnect_call(), which is now (incorrectly) setting the
disconnection bit, meaning that when rxrpc_release_call() is later called,
it doesn't call rxrpc_disconnect_call() and so the call isn't removed from
the peer's error distribution list and the list gets corrupted.

KASAN finds the issue as an access after release on a call, but the
position at which it occurs is confusing as it appears to be related to a
different call (the call site is where the latter call is being removed
from the error distribution list and either the next or pprev pointer
points to a previously released call).

Fix this by moving the setting of the flag from __rxrpc_disconnect_call()
to rxrpc_disconnect_call() in the same place that the connection pointer
was being cleared.

Fixes: 5273a191 ("rxrpc: Fix NULL pointer deref due to call->conn being cleared on disconnect")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent f798a5a0
...@@ -171,8 +171,6 @@ void __rxrpc_disconnect_call(struct rxrpc_connection *conn, ...@@ -171,8 +171,6 @@ void __rxrpc_disconnect_call(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
_enter("%d,%x", conn->debug_id, call->cid); _enter("%d,%x", conn->debug_id, call->cid);
set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_DISCONNECTED, &call->flags);
if (rcu_access_pointer(chan->call) == call) { if (rcu_access_pointer(chan->call) == call) {
/* Save the result of the call so that we can repeat it if necessary /* Save the result of the call so that we can repeat it if necessary
* through the channel, whilst disposing of the actual call record. * through the channel, whilst disposing of the actual call record.
...@@ -225,6 +223,7 @@ void rxrpc_disconnect_call(struct rxrpc_call *call) ...@@ -225,6 +223,7 @@ void rxrpc_disconnect_call(struct rxrpc_call *call)
__rxrpc_disconnect_call(conn, call); __rxrpc_disconnect_call(conn, call);
spin_unlock(&conn->channel_lock); spin_unlock(&conn->channel_lock);
set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_DISCONNECTED, &call->flags);
conn->idle_timestamp = jiffies; conn->idle_timestamp = jiffies;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment