staging: lustre: ptlrpc: fix lproc_ptlrpc static declarations

This patch fixes the following sparse warnings:

drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c:51:3:warning:
 symbol 'll_rpc_opcode_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c:142:3: warning:
 symbol 'll_eopcode_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c:178:12: warning:
 symbol 'll_eopcode2str' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c:731:1: warning:
 symbol 'ptlrpc_lprocfs_svc_req_history_seek' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Jon Bernard <jbernard@tuxion.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c

@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
 #include "ptlrpc_internal.h"
 
 
-struct ll_rpc_opcode {
+static struct ll_rpc_opcode {
 	__u32       opcode;
 	const char *opname;
 } ll_rpc_opcode_table[LUSTRE_MAX_OPCODES] = {
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ struct ll_rpc_opcode {
 	{ UPDATE_OBJ,	    "update_obj" },
 };
 
-struct ll_eopcode {
+static struct ll_eopcode {
 	__u32       opcode;
 	const char *opname;
 } ll_eopcode_table[EXTRA_LAST_OPC] = {
@@ -175,11 +175,12 @@ const char *ll_opcode2str(__u32 opcode)
 	return ll_rpc_opcode_table[offset].opname;
 }
 
-const char *ll_eopcode2str(__u32 opcode)
+static const char *ll_eopcode2str(__u32 opcode)
 {
 	LASSERT(ll_eopcode_table[opcode].opcode == opcode);
 	return ll_eopcode_table[opcode].opname;
 }
+
 #if defined (CONFIG_PROC_FS)
 static void ptlrpc_lprocfs_register(struct proc_dir_entry *root, char *dir,
 				    char *name,
@@ -727,7 +728,7 @@ struct ptlrpc_srh_iterator {
 	struct ptlrpc_request	*srhi_req;
 };
 
-int
+static int
 ptlrpc_lprocfs_svc_req_history_seek(struct ptlrpc_service_part *svcpt,
 				    struct ptlrpc_srh_iterator *srhi,
 				    __u64 seq)