Commit b82a26d8 authored by Hans de Goede's avatar Hans de Goede Committed by Luiz Augusto von Dentz

Bluetooth: hci_event: Fix vendor (unknown) opcode status handling

Commit c8992cff ("Bluetooth: hci_event: Use of a function table to
handle Command Complete") was (presumably) meant to only refactor things
without any functional changes.

But it does have one undesirable side-effect, before *status would always
be set to skb->data[0] and it might be overridden by some of the opcode
specific handling. While now it always set by the opcode specific handlers.
This means that if the opcode is not known *status does not get set any
more at all!

This behavior change has broken bluetooth support for BCM4343A0 HCIs,
the hci_bcm.c code tries to configure UART attached HCIs at a higher
baudraute using vendor specific opcodes. The BCM4343A0 does not
support this and this used to simply fail:

[   25.646442] Bluetooth: hci0: BCM: failed to write clock (-56)
[   25.646481] Bluetooth: hci0: Failed to set baudrate

After which things would continue with the initial baudraute. But now
that hci_cmd_complete_evt() no longer sets status for unknown opcodes
*status is left at 0. This causes the hci_bcm.c code to think the baudraute
has been changed on the HCI side and to also adjust the UART baudrate,
after which communication with the HCI is broken, leading to:

[   28.579042] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x0c03 tx timeout
[   36.961601] Bluetooth: hci0: BCM: Reset failed (-110)

And non working bluetooth. Fix this by restoring the previous
default "*status = skb->data[0]" handling for unknown opcodes.

Fixes: c8992cff ("Bluetooth: hci_event: Use of a function table to handle Command Complete")
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLuiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
parent 4c612826
......@@ -4179,6 +4179,17 @@ static void hci_cmd_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
}
}
if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(hci_cc_table)) {
/* Unknown opcode, assume byte 0 contains the status, so
* that e.g. __hci_cmd_sync() properly returns errors
* for vendor specific commands send by HCI drivers.
* If a vendor doesn't actually follow this convention we may
* need to introduce a vendor CC table in order to properly set
* the status.
*/
*status = skb->data[0];
}
handle_cmd_cnt_and_timer(hdev, ev->ncmd);
hci_req_cmd_complete(hdev, *opcode, *status, req_complete,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment