Commit b82d4043 authored by Dmitri Vorobiev's avatar Dmitri Vorobiev Committed by Linus Torvalds

Fix typos in Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt

A couple of typos crept into the newly added document about the seq_file
interface.  This patch corrects those typos and simultaneously deletes
unnecessary trailing spaces.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 1f4deba8
......@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ implementations; in most cases the start() function should check for a
"past end of file" condition and return NULL if need be.
For more complicated applications, the private field of the seq_file
structure can be used. There is also a special value whch can be returned
structure can be used. There is also a special value which can be returned
by the start() function called SEQ_START_TOKEN; it can be used if you wish
to instruct your show() function (described below) to print a header at the
top of the output. SEQ_START_TOKEN should only be used if the offset is
......@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ the four functions we have just defined:
This structure will be needed to tie our iterator to the /proc file in
a little bit.
It's worth noting that the interator value returned by start() and
It's worth noting that the iterator value returned by start() and
manipulated by the other functions is considered to be completely opaque by
the seq_file code. It can thus be anything that is useful in stepping
through the data to be output. Counters can be useful, but it could also be
......@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ routines useful:
These helpers will interpret pos as a position within the list and iterate
accordingly. Your start() and next() functions need only invoke the
seq_list_* helpers with a pointer to the appropriate list_head structure.
seq_list_* helpers with a pointer to the appropriate list_head structure.
The extra-simple version
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment