Commit b831281b authored by NeilBrown's avatar NeilBrown Committed by Jan Kara

reiserfs: don't use congestion_wait()

Block devices do not, in general, report congestion any more, so this
congestion_wait() is effectively just a sleep.

It isn't entirely clear what is being waited for, but as we only wait
when j_async_throttle is elevated, it seems reasonable to stop waiting
when j_async_throttle becomes zero - or after the same timeout.

So change to use wait_event_event_timeout() for waiting, and
wake_up_var() to signal an end to waiting.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163712368225.13692.3419908086400748349@noble.neil.brown.nameSigned-off-by: default avatarNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
parent a48fc69f
......@@ -951,7 +951,9 @@ static int reiserfs_async_progress_wait(struct super_block *s)
int depth;
depth = reiserfs_write_unlock_nested(s);
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ / 10);
wait_var_event_timeout(&j->j_async_throttle,
atomic_read(&j->j_async_throttle) == 0,
HZ / 10);
reiserfs_write_lock_nested(s, depth);
}
......@@ -1058,7 +1060,8 @@ static int flush_commit_list(struct super_block *s,
put_bh(tbh) ;
}
}
atomic_dec(&journal->j_async_throttle);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&journal->j_async_throttle))
wake_up_var(&journal->j_async_throttle);
for (i = 0; i < (jl->j_len + 1); i++) {
bn = SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(s) +
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment