Commit b9c63388 authored by Marek Szyprowski's avatar Marek Szyprowski Committed by Inki Dae

drm/exynos: Properly propagate return value in drm_iommu_attach_device()

Propagate the proper error codes from the called functions instead of
unconditionally returning 0.
Reported-by: default avatarkbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Merge conflict so merged it manually.
Signed-off-by: default avatarInki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
parent aee83fbd
......@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int drm_iommu_attach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
struct device *subdrv_dev, void **dma_priv)
{
struct exynos_drm_private *priv = drm_dev->dev_private;
int ret;
int ret = 0;
if (get_dma_ops(priv->dma_dev) != get_dma_ops(subdrv_dev)) {
DRM_DEV_ERROR(subdrv_dev, "Device %s lacks support for IOMMU\n",
......@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int drm_iommu_attach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
if (ret)
clear_dma_max_seg_size(subdrv_dev);
return 0;
return ret;
}
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment