Commit baaee956 authored by Peter Xu's avatar Peter Xu Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

kvm: Check irqchip mode before assign irqfd

commit 654f1f13 upstream.

When assigning kvm irqfd we didn't check the irqchip mode but we allow
KVM_IRQFD to succeed with all the irqchip modes.  However it does not
make much sense to create irqfd even without the kernel chips.  Let's
provide a arch-dependent helper to check whether a specific irqfd is
allowed by the arch.  At least for x86, it should make sense to check:

- when irqchip mode is NONE, all irqfds should be disallowed, and,

- when irqchip mode is SPLIT, irqfds that are with resamplefd should
  be disallowed.

For either of the case, previously we'll silently ignore the irq or
the irq ack event if the irqchip mode is incorrect.  However that can
cause misterious guest behaviors and it can be hard to triage.  Let's
fail KVM_IRQFD even earlier to detect these incorrect configurations.

CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
CC: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
CC: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
CC: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent e00303be
......@@ -172,3 +172,10 @@ void __kvm_migrate_timers(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
__kvm_migrate_apic_timer(vcpu);
__kvm_migrate_pit_timer(vcpu);
}
bool kvm_arch_irqfd_allowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd *args)
{
bool resample = args->flags & KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE;
return resample ? irqchip_kernel(kvm) : irqchip_in_kernel(kvm);
}
......@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static inline int irqchip_in_kernel(struct kvm *kvm)
return mode != KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE;
}
bool kvm_arch_irqfd_allowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd *args);
void kvm_inject_pending_timer_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_inject_apic_timer_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_apic_nmi_wd_deliver(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
......
......@@ -44,6 +44,12 @@
static struct workqueue_struct *irqfd_cleanup_wq;
bool __attribute__((weak))
kvm_arch_irqfd_allowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd *args)
{
return true;
}
static void
irqfd_inject(struct work_struct *work)
{
......@@ -297,6 +303,9 @@ kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd *args)
if (!kvm_arch_intc_initialized(kvm))
return -EAGAIN;
if (!kvm_arch_irqfd_allowed(kvm, args))
return -EINVAL;
irqfd = kzalloc(sizeof(*irqfd), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!irqfd)
return -ENOMEM;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment