Commit bb08abc7 authored by Jonathan Cameron's avatar Jonathan Cameron

iio:common:ssp: Switch from CONFIG_PM_SLEEP guards to pm_sleep_ptr() etc

Letting the compiler remove these functions when the kernel is built
without CONFIG_PM_SLEEP support is simpler and less error prone than the
use of ifdef based config guards.  Also switch to SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS
rather than open coding the structure.

Removing instances of this approach from IIO also stops them being
copied into new drivers.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPaul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130193147.279148-17-jic23@kernel.org
parent 9cbeee0f
......@@ -600,7 +600,6 @@ static int ssp_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
return 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
static int ssp_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
int ret;
......@@ -649,17 +648,14 @@ static int ssp_resume(struct device *dev)
return 0;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
static const struct dev_pm_ops ssp_pm_ops = {
SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(ssp_suspend, ssp_resume)
};
static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ssp_pm_ops, ssp_suspend, ssp_resume);
static struct spi_driver ssp_driver = {
.probe = ssp_probe,
.remove = ssp_remove,
.driver = {
.pm = &ssp_pm_ops,
.pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&ssp_pm_ops),
.of_match_table = ssp_of_match,
.name = "sensorhub"
},
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment