s390: cio: fix cio_irb declaration
[ Upstream commit e91012ee ] clang points out that the declaration of cio_irb does not match the definition exactly, it is missing the alignment attribute: ../drivers/s390/cio/cio.c:50:1: warning: section does not match previous declaration [-Wsection] DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct irb, cio_irb); ^ ../include/linux/percpu-defs.h:150:2: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED' DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, PER_CPU_ALIGNED_SECTION) \ ^ ../include/linux/percpu-defs.h:93:9: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION' extern __PCPU_ATTRS(sec) __typeof__(type) name; \ ^ ../include/linux/percpu-defs.h:49:26: note: expanded from macro '__PCPU_ATTRS' __percpu __attribute__((section(PER_CPU_BASE_SECTION sec))) \ ^ ../drivers/s390/cio/cio.h:118:1: note: previous attribute is here DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct irb, cio_irb); ^ ../include/linux/percpu-defs.h:111:2: note: expanded from macro 'DECLARE_PER_CPU' DECLARE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, "") ^ ../include/linux/percpu-defs.h:87:9: note: expanded from macro 'DECLARE_PER_CPU_SECTION' extern __PCPU_ATTRS(sec) __typeof__(type) name ^ ../include/linux/percpu-defs.h:49:26: note: expanded from macro '__PCPU_ATTRS' __percpu __attribute__((section(PER_CPU_BASE_SECTION sec))) \ ^ Use DECLARE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED() here, to make the two match. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment