swiotlb: fix a braino in the alignment check fix

The alignment mask in swiotlb_do_find_slots() masks off the high
bits which are not relevant for the alignment, so multiple
requirements are combined with a bitwise OR rather than AND.
In plain English, the stricter the alignment, the more bits must
be set in iotlb_align_mask.

Confusion may arise from the fact that the same variable is also
used to mask off the offset within a swiotlb slot, which is
achieved with a bitwise AND.

Fixes: 0eee5ae1 ("swiotlb: fix slot alignment checks")
Reported-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAA42JLa1y9jJ7BgQvXeUYQh-K2mDNHd2BYZ4iZUz33r5zY7oAQ@mail.gmail.com/Reported-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230405003549.GA21326@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net/Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

kernel/dma/swiotlb.c

@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int swiotlb_do_find_slots(struct device *dev, int area_index,
 		phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, mem->start) & boundary_mask;
 	unsigned long max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
 	unsigned int iotlb_align_mask =
-		dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) & ~(IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
+		dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) | alloc_align_mask;
 	unsigned int nslots = nr_slots(alloc_size), stride;
 	unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr);
 	unsigned int index, slots_checked, count = 0, i;
@@ -639,8 +639,8 @@ static int swiotlb_do_find_slots(struct device *dev, int area_index,
 	 * allocations.
 	 */
 	if (alloc_size >= PAGE_SIZE)
-		iotlb_align_mask &= PAGE_MASK;
-	iotlb_align_mask &= alloc_align_mask;
+		iotlb_align_mask |= ~PAGE_MASK;
+	iotlb_align_mask &= ~(IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
 
 	/*
 	 * For mappings with an alignment requirement don't bother looping to