Commit bc55cfd5 authored by Takashi Iwai's avatar Takashi Iwai

ALSA: pcm: Fix potential AB/BA lock with buffer_mutex and mmap_lock

syzbot caught a potential deadlock between the PCM
runtime->buffer_mutex and the mm->mmap_lock.  It was brought by the
recent fix to cover the racy read/write and other ioctls, and in that
commit, I overlooked a (hopefully only) corner case that may take the
revert lock, namely, the OSS mmap.  The OSS mmap operation
exceptionally allows to re-configure the parameters inside the OSS
mmap syscall, where mm->mmap_mutex is already held.  Meanwhile, the
copy_from/to_user calls at read/write operations also take the
mm->mmap_lock internally, hence it may lead to a AB/BA deadlock.

A similar problem was already seen in the past and we fixed it with a
refcount (in commit b2483716).  The former fix covered only the
call paths with OSS read/write and OSS ioctls, while we need to cover
the concurrent access via both ALSA and OSS APIs now.

This patch addresses the problem above by replacing the buffer_mutex
lock in the read/write operations with a refcount similar as we've
used for OSS.  The new field, runtime->buffer_accessing, keeps the
number of concurrent read/write operations.  Unlike the former
buffer_mutex protection, this protects only around the
copy_from/to_user() calls; the other codes are basically protected by
the PCM stream lock.  The refcount can be a negative, meaning blocked
by the ioctls.  If a negative value is seen, the read/write aborts
with -EBUSY.  In the ioctl side, OTOH, they check this refcount, too,
and set to a negative value for blocking unless it's already being
accessed.

Reported-by: syzbot+6e5c88838328e99c7e1c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: dca947d4 ("ALSA: pcm: Fix races among concurrent read/write and buffer changes")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/000000000000381a0d05db622a81@google.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220330120903.4738-1-tiwai@suse.deSigned-off-by: default avatarTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
parent 21b5954d
......@@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ struct snd_pcm_runtime {
struct fasync_struct *fasync;
bool stop_operating; /* sync_stop will be called */
struct mutex buffer_mutex; /* protect for buffer changes */
atomic_t buffer_accessing; /* >0: in r/w operation, <0: blocked */
/* -- private section -- */
void *private_data;
......
......@@ -970,6 +970,7 @@ int snd_pcm_attach_substream(struct snd_pcm *pcm, int stream,
runtime->status->state = SNDRV_PCM_STATE_OPEN;
mutex_init(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
atomic_set(&runtime->buffer_accessing, 0);
substream->runtime = runtime;
substream->private_data = pcm->private_data;
......
......@@ -1906,11 +1906,9 @@ static int wait_for_avail(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
if (avail >= runtime->twake)
break;
snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream);
mutex_unlock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
tout = schedule_timeout(wait_time);
mutex_lock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream);
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
switch (runtime->status->state) {
......@@ -2221,7 +2219,6 @@ snd_pcm_sframes_t __snd_pcm_lib_xfer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
nonblock = !!(substream->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
mutex_lock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream);
err = pcm_accessible_state(runtime);
if (err < 0)
......@@ -2276,6 +2273,10 @@ snd_pcm_sframes_t __snd_pcm_lib_xfer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
err = -EINVAL;
goto _end_unlock;
}
if (!atomic_inc_unless_negative(&runtime->buffer_accessing)) {
err = -EBUSY;
goto _end_unlock;
}
snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream);
if (!is_playback)
snd_pcm_dma_buffer_sync(substream, SNDRV_DMA_SYNC_CPU);
......@@ -2284,6 +2285,7 @@ snd_pcm_sframes_t __snd_pcm_lib_xfer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
if (is_playback)
snd_pcm_dma_buffer_sync(substream, SNDRV_DMA_SYNC_DEVICE);
snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream);
atomic_dec(&runtime->buffer_accessing);
if (err < 0)
goto _end_unlock;
err = pcm_accessible_state(runtime);
......@@ -2313,7 +2315,6 @@ snd_pcm_sframes_t __snd_pcm_lib_xfer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
if (xfer > 0 && err >= 0)
snd_pcm_update_state(substream, runtime);
snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream);
mutex_unlock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
return xfer > 0 ? (snd_pcm_sframes_t)xfer : err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__snd_pcm_lib_xfer);
......
......@@ -685,6 +685,24 @@ static int snd_pcm_hw_params_choose(struct snd_pcm_substream *pcm,
return 0;
}
/* acquire buffer_mutex; if it's in r/w operation, return -EBUSY, otherwise
* block the further r/w operations
*/
static int snd_pcm_buffer_access_lock(struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime)
{
if (!atomic_dec_unless_positive(&runtime->buffer_accessing))
return -EBUSY;
mutex_lock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
return 0; /* keep buffer_mutex, unlocked by below */
}
/* release buffer_mutex and clear r/w access flag */
static void snd_pcm_buffer_access_unlock(struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime)
{
mutex_unlock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
atomic_inc(&runtime->buffer_accessing);
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS)
#define is_oss_stream(substream) ((substream)->oss.oss)
#else
......@@ -695,14 +713,16 @@ static int snd_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params)
{
struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime;
int err = 0, usecs;
int err, usecs;
unsigned int bits;
snd_pcm_uframes_t frames;
if (PCM_RUNTIME_CHECK(substream))
return -ENXIO;
runtime = substream->runtime;
mutex_lock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
err = snd_pcm_buffer_access_lock(runtime);
if (err < 0)
return err;
snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream);
switch (runtime->status->state) {
case SNDRV_PCM_STATE_OPEN:
......@@ -820,7 +840,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
snd_pcm_lib_free_pages(substream);
}
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
snd_pcm_buffer_access_unlock(runtime);
return err;
}
......@@ -865,7 +885,9 @@ static int snd_pcm_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
if (PCM_RUNTIME_CHECK(substream))
return -ENXIO;
runtime = substream->runtime;
mutex_lock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
result = snd_pcm_buffer_access_lock(runtime);
if (result < 0)
return result;
snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream);
switch (runtime->status->state) {
case SNDRV_PCM_STATE_SETUP:
......@@ -884,7 +906,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
snd_pcm_set_state(substream, SNDRV_PCM_STATE_OPEN);
cpu_latency_qos_remove_request(&substream->latency_pm_qos_req);
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
snd_pcm_buffer_access_unlock(runtime);
return result;
}
......@@ -1369,12 +1391,15 @@ static int snd_pcm_action_nonatomic(const struct action_ops *ops,
/* Guarantee the group members won't change during non-atomic action */
down_read(&snd_pcm_link_rwsem);
mutex_lock(&substream->runtime->buffer_mutex);
res = snd_pcm_buffer_access_lock(substream->runtime);
if (res < 0)
goto unlock;
if (snd_pcm_stream_linked(substream))
res = snd_pcm_action_group(ops, substream, state, false);
else
res = snd_pcm_action_single(ops, substream, state);
mutex_unlock(&substream->runtime->buffer_mutex);
snd_pcm_buffer_access_unlock(substream->runtime);
unlock:
up_read(&snd_pcm_link_rwsem);
return res;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment