Commit bd955a4e authored by Stefan Berger's avatar Stefan Berger Committed by Herbert Xu

crypto: ecdh - Pass private key in proper byte order to check valid key

ecc_is_key_valid expects a key with the most significant digit in the last
entry of the digit array. Currently ecdh_set_secret passes a reversed key
to ecc_is_key_valid that then passes the rather simple test checking
whether the private key is in range [2, n-3]. For all current ecdh-
supported curves (NIST P192/256/384) the 'n' parameter is a rather large
number, therefore easily passing this test.

Throughout the ecdh and ecc codebase the variable 'priv' is used for a
private_key holding the bytes in proper byte order. Therefore, introduce
priv in ecdh_set_secret and copy the bytes from ctx->private_key into
priv in proper byte order by using ecc_swap_digits. Pass priv to
ecc_is_valid_key.

Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Salvatore Benedetto <salvatore.benedetto@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarStefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
parent 5ae6d3f5
......@@ -27,7 +27,9 @@ static int ecdh_set_secret(struct crypto_kpp *tfm, const void *buf,
unsigned int len)
{
struct ecdh_ctx *ctx = ecdh_get_ctx(tfm);
u64 priv[ECC_MAX_DIGITS];
struct ecdh params;
int ret = 0;
if (crypto_ecdh_decode_key(buf, len, &params) < 0 ||
params.key_size > sizeof(u64) * ctx->ndigits)
......@@ -40,13 +42,16 @@ static int ecdh_set_secret(struct crypto_kpp *tfm, const void *buf,
ctx->private_key);
memcpy(ctx->private_key, params.key, params.key_size);
ecc_swap_digits(ctx->private_key, priv, ctx->ndigits);
if (ecc_is_key_valid(ctx->curve_id, ctx->ndigits,
ctx->private_key, params.key_size) < 0) {
priv, params.key_size) < 0) {
memzero_explicit(ctx->private_key, params.key_size);
return -EINVAL;
ret = -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
memzero_explicit(priv, sizeof(priv));
return ret;
}
static int ecdh_compute_value(struct kpp_request *req)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment