Commit be20aa00 authored by Jeff Layton's avatar Jeff Layton Committed by J. Bruce Fields

nfsd: don't hold ls_mutex across a layout recall

We do need to serialize layout stateid morphing operations, but we
currently hold the ls_mutex across a layout recall which is pretty
ugly. It's also unnecessary -- once we've bumped the seqid and
copied it, we don't need to serialize the rest of the CB_LAYOUTRECALL
vs. anything else. Just drop the mutex once the copy is done.

This was causing a "workqueue leaked lock or atomic" warning and an
occasional deadlock.

There's more work to be done here but this fixes the immediate
regression.

Fixes: cc8a5532 "nfsd: serialize layout stateid morphing operations"
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: default avatarKinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
parent 8005c49d
......@@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ nfsd4_cb_layout_prepare(struct nfsd4_callback *cb)
mutex_lock(&ls->ls_mutex);
nfs4_inc_and_copy_stateid(&ls->ls_recall_sid, &ls->ls_stid);
mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_mutex);
}
static int
......@@ -659,7 +660,6 @@ nfsd4_cb_layout_release(struct nfsd4_callback *cb)
trace_layout_recall_release(&ls->ls_stid.sc_stateid);
mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_mutex);
nfsd4_return_all_layouts(ls, &reaplist);
nfsd4_free_layouts(&reaplist);
nfs4_put_stid(&ls->ls_stid);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment