drm/vc4: Use newer fence API properly to fix build errors

The commit 73511edf ("dma-buf: specify usage while adding fences to
dma_resv obj v7") ported all the DRM drivers to use the newer fence API
that specifies the usage with the enum dma_resv_usage rather than doing
an explicit shared / exclusive distinction.

But the commit didn't do it properly in two callers of the vc4 driver,
leading to build errors.

Fixes: 73511edf ("dma-buf: specify usage while adding fences to dma_resv obj v7")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJavier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220407131950.915091-1-javierm@redhat.com
parent 7cee157b
......@@ -546,7 +546,8 @@ vc4_update_bo_seqnos(struct vc4_exec_info *exec, uint64_t seqno)
bo = to_vc4_bo(&exec->bo[i]->base);
bo->seqno = seqno;
dma_resv_add_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence);
dma_resv_add_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence,
DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ);
}
list_for_each_entry(bo, &exec->unref_list, unref_head) {
......@@ -557,7 +558,8 @@ vc4_update_bo_seqnos(struct vc4_exec_info *exec, uint64_t seqno)
bo = to_vc4_bo(&exec->rcl_write_bo[i]->base);
bo->write_seqno = seqno;
dma_resv_add_excl_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence);
dma_resv_add_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence,
DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE);
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment