Commit c12cd77c authored by Omar Sandoval's avatar Omar Sandoval Committed by Linus Torvalds

mm/vmalloc: fix spinning drain_vmap_work after reading from /proc/vmcore

Commit 3ee48b6a ("mm, x86: Saving vmcore with non-lazy freeing of
vmas") introduced set_iounmap_nonlazy(), which sets vmap_lazy_nr to
lazy_max_pages() + 1, ensuring that any future vunmaps() immediately
purge the vmap areas instead of doing it lazily.

Commit 690467c8 ("mm/vmalloc: Move draining areas out of caller
context") moved the purging from the vunmap() caller to a worker thread.
Unfortunately, set_iounmap_nonlazy() can cause the worker thread to spin
(possibly forever).  For example, consider the following scenario:

 1. Thread reads from /proc/vmcore. This eventually calls
    __copy_oldmem_page() -> set_iounmap_nonlazy(), which sets
    vmap_lazy_nr to lazy_max_pages() + 1.

 2. Then it calls free_vmap_area_noflush() (via iounmap()), which adds 2
    pages (one page plus the guard page) to the purge list and
    vmap_lazy_nr. vmap_lazy_nr is now lazy_max_pages() + 3, so the
    drain_vmap_work is scheduled.

 3. Thread returns from the kernel and is scheduled out.

 4. Worker thread is scheduled in and calls drain_vmap_area_work(). It
    frees the 2 pages on the purge list. vmap_lazy_nr is now
    lazy_max_pages() + 1.

 5. This is still over the threshold, so it tries to purge areas again,
    but doesn't find anything.

 6. Repeat 5.

If the system is running with only one CPU (which is typicial for kdump)
and preemption is disabled, then this will never make forward progress:
there aren't any more pages to purge, so it hangs.  If there is more
than one CPU or preemption is enabled, then the worker thread will spin
forever in the background.  (Note that if there were already pages to be
purged at the time that set_iounmap_nonlazy() was called, this bug is
avoided.)

This can be reproduced with anything that reads from /proc/vmcore
multiple times.  E.g., vmcore-dmesg /proc/vmcore.

It turns out that improvements to vmap() over the years have obsoleted
the need for this "optimization".  I benchmarked `dd if=/proc/vmcore
of=/dev/null` with 4k and 1M read sizes on a system with a 32GB vmcore.
The test was run on 5.17, 5.18-rc1 with a fix that avoided the hang, and
5.18-rc1 with set_iounmap_nonlazy() removed entirely:

    |5.17  |5.18+fix|5.18+removal
  4k|40.86s|  40.09s|      26.73s
  1M|24.47s|  23.98s|      21.84s

The removal was the fastest (by a wide margin with 4k reads).  This
patch removes set_iounmap_nonlazy().

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/52f819991051f9b865e9ce25605509bfdbacadcd.1649277321.git.osandov@fb.com
Fixes: 690467c8  ("mm/vmalloc: Move draining areas out of caller context")
Signed-off-by: default avatarOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Acked-by: default avatarChris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Reviewed-by: default avatarUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: default avatarBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent aeb79237
......@@ -210,8 +210,6 @@ void __iomem *ioremap(resource_size_t offset, unsigned long size);
extern void iounmap(volatile void __iomem *addr);
#define iounmap iounmap
extern void set_iounmap_nonlazy(void);
#ifdef __KERNEL__
void memcpy_fromio(void *, const volatile void __iomem *, size_t);
......
......@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ static ssize_t __copy_oldmem_page(unsigned long pfn, char *buf, size_t csize,
} else
memcpy(buf, vaddr + offset, csize);
set_iounmap_nonlazy();
iounmap((void __iomem *)vaddr);
return csize;
}
......
......@@ -1671,17 +1671,6 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(vmap_purge_lock);
/* for per-CPU blocks */
static void purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
/*
* called before a call to iounmap() if the caller wants vm_area_struct's
* immediately freed.
*/
void set_iounmap_nonlazy(void)
{
atomic_long_set(&vmap_lazy_nr, lazy_max_pages()+1);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
/*
* Purges all lazily-freed vmap areas.
*/
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment