mm/cma_debug.c: fix the break condition in cma_maxchunk_get()

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836666

[ Upstream commit f0fd5050 ]

If not find zero bit in find_next_zero_bit(), it will return the size
parameter passed in, so the start bit should be compared with bitmap_maxno
rather than cma->count.  Although getting maxchunk is working fine due to
zero value of order_per_bit currently, the operation will be stuck if
order_per_bit is set as non-zero.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190319092734.276-1-zbestahu@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <d.safonov@partner.samsung.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Khalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>

mm/cma_debug.c

@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static int cma_maxchunk_get(void *data, u64 *val)
 	mutex_lock(&cma->lock);
 	for (;;) {
 		start = find_next_zero_bit(cma->bitmap, bitmap_maxno, end);
-		if (start >= cma->count)
+		if (start >= bitmap_maxno)
 			break;
 		end = find_next_bit(cma->bitmap, bitmap_maxno, start);
 		maxchunk = max(end - start, maxchunk);