thunderbolt: eeprom: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertenly introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

drivers/thunderbolt/eeprom.c

@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ struct tb_drom_entry_header {
 
 struct tb_drom_entry_generic {
 	struct tb_drom_entry_header header;
-	u8 data[0];
+	u8 data[];
 } __packed;
 
 struct tb_drom_entry_port {