Commit c3724357 authored by Alex Deucher's avatar Alex Deucher

drm/amdgpu/display: handle multiple numbers of fclks in dcn_calcs.c (v2)

We might get different numbers of clocks from powerplay depending
on what the OEM has populated.

v2: add assert for at least one level

Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/issues/963Reviewed-by: default avatarNicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
parent 0531aa6e
......@@ -1435,6 +1435,7 @@ void dcn_bw_update_from_pplib(struct dc *dc)
struct dc_context *ctx = dc->ctx;
struct dm_pp_clock_levels_with_voltage fclks = {0}, dcfclks = {0};
bool res;
unsigned vmin0p65_idx, vmid0p72_idx, vnom0p8_idx, vmax0p9_idx;
/* TODO: This is not the proper way to obtain fabric_and_dram_bandwidth, should be min(fclk, memclk) */
res = dm_pp_get_clock_levels_by_type_with_voltage(
......@@ -1446,17 +1447,28 @@ void dcn_bw_update_from_pplib(struct dc *dc)
res = verify_clock_values(&fclks);
if (res) {
ASSERT(fclks.num_levels >= 3);
dc->dcn_soc->fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmin0p65 = 32 * (fclks.data[0].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0) / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc->fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmid0p72 = dc->dcn_soc->number_of_channels *
(fclks.data[fclks.num_levels - (fclks.num_levels > 2 ? 3 : 2)].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0)
* ddr4_dram_factor_single_Channel / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc->fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vnom0p8 = dc->dcn_soc->number_of_channels *
(fclks.data[fclks.num_levels - 2].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0)
* ddr4_dram_factor_single_Channel / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc->fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmax0p9 = dc->dcn_soc->number_of_channels *
(fclks.data[fclks.num_levels - 1].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0)
* ddr4_dram_factor_single_Channel / 1000.0;
ASSERT(fclks.num_levels);
vmin0p65_idx = 0;
vmid0p72_idx = fclks.num_levels -
(fclks.num_levels > 2 ? 3 : (fclks.num_levels > 1 ? 2 : 1));
vnom0p8_idx = fclks.num_levels - (fclks.num_levels > 1 ? 2 : 1);
vmax0p9_idx = fclks.num_levels - 1;
dc->dcn_soc->fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmin0p65 =
32 * (fclks.data[vmin0p65_idx].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0) / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc->fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmid0p72 =
dc->dcn_soc->number_of_channels *
(fclks.data[vmid0p72_idx].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0)
* ddr4_dram_factor_single_Channel / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc->fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vnom0p8 =
dc->dcn_soc->number_of_channels *
(fclks.data[vnom0p8_idx].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0)
* ddr4_dram_factor_single_Channel / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc->fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmax0p9 =
dc->dcn_soc->number_of_channels *
(fclks.data[vmax0p9_idx].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0)
* ddr4_dram_factor_single_Channel / 1000.0;
} else
BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment