Commit c51abd96 authored by Eric Biggers's avatar Eric Biggers Committed by Jarkko Sakkinen

KEYS: fix length validation in keyctl_pkey_params_get_2()

In many cases, keyctl_pkey_params_get_2() is validating the user buffer
lengths against the wrong algorithm properties.  Fix it to check against
the correct properties.

Probably this wasn't noticed before because for all asymmetric keys of
the "public_key" subtype, max_data_size == max_sig_size == max_enc_size
== max_dec_size.  However, this isn't necessarily true for the
"asym_tpm" subtype (it should be, but it's not strictly validated).  Of
course, future key types could have different values as well.

Fixes: 00d60fd3 ("KEYS: Provide keyctls to drive the new key type ops for asymmetric keys [ver #2]")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.20+
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
parent 8335adb8
......@@ -135,15 +135,23 @@ static int keyctl_pkey_params_get_2(const struct keyctl_pkey_params __user *_par
switch (op) {
case KEYCTL_PKEY_ENCRYPT:
if (uparams.in_len > info.max_dec_size ||
uparams.out_len > info.max_enc_size)
return -EINVAL;
break;
case KEYCTL_PKEY_DECRYPT:
if (uparams.in_len > info.max_enc_size ||
uparams.out_len > info.max_dec_size)
return -EINVAL;
break;
case KEYCTL_PKEY_SIGN:
if (uparams.in_len > info.max_data_size ||
uparams.out_len > info.max_sig_size)
return -EINVAL;
break;
case KEYCTL_PKEY_VERIFY:
if (uparams.in_len > info.max_sig_size ||
uparams.out_len > info.max_data_size)
if (uparams.in_len > info.max_data_size ||
uparams.in2_len > info.max_sig_size)
return -EINVAL;
break;
default:
......@@ -151,7 +159,7 @@ static int keyctl_pkey_params_get_2(const struct keyctl_pkey_params __user *_par
}
params->in_len = uparams.in_len;
params->out_len = uparams.out_len;
params->out_len = uparams.out_len; /* Note: same as in2_len */
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment