Commit c5f8cd6c authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo

workqueue: Avoid premature init of wq->node_nr_active[].max

System workqueues are allocated early during boot from
workqueue_init_early(). While allocating unbound workqueues,
wq_update_node_max_active() is invoked from apply_workqueue_attrs() and
accesses NUMA topology to initialize wq->node_nr_active[].max.

However, topology information may not be set up at this point.
wq_update_node_max_active() is explicitly invoked from
workqueue_init_topology() later when topology information is known to be
available.

This doesn't seem to crash anything but it's doing useless work with dubious
data. Let's skip the premature and duplicate node_max_active updates by
initializing the field to WQ_DFL_MIN_ACTIVE on allocation and making
wq_update_node_max_active() noop until workqueue_init_topology().
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 9221a4c57ae1..a65081ec6780 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -386,6 +386,8 @@ static const char *wq_affn_names[WQ_AFFN_NR_TYPES] = {
 	[WQ_AFFN_SYSTEM]		= "system",
 };

+static bool wq_topo_initialized = false;
+
 /*
  * Per-cpu work items which run for longer than the following threshold are
  * automatically considered CPU intensive and excluded from concurrency
@@ -1510,6 +1512,9 @@ static void wq_update_node_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int off_cpu)

 	lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);

+	if (!wq_topo_initialized)
+		return;
+
 	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(off_cpu, effective))
 		off_cpu = -1;

@@ -4356,6 +4361,7 @@ static void free_node_nr_active(struct wq_node_nr_active **nna_ar)

 static void init_node_nr_active(struct wq_node_nr_active *nna)
 {
+	nna->max = WQ_DFL_MIN_ACTIVE;
 	atomic_set(&nna->nr, 0);
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&nna->lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nna->pending_pwqs);
@@ -7400,6 +7406,8 @@ void __init workqueue_init_topology(void)
 	init_pod_type(&wq_pod_types[WQ_AFFN_CACHE], cpus_share_cache);
 	init_pod_type(&wq_pod_types[WQ_AFFN_NUMA], cpus_share_numa);

+	wq_topo_initialized = true;
+
 	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);

 	/*
parent 15930da4
......@@ -386,6 +386,8 @@ static const char *wq_affn_names[WQ_AFFN_NR_TYPES] = {
[WQ_AFFN_SYSTEM] = "system",
};
static bool wq_topo_initialized __read_mostly = false;
/*
* Per-cpu work items which run for longer than the following threshold are
* automatically considered CPU intensive and excluded from concurrency
......@@ -1510,6 +1512,9 @@ static void wq_update_node_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int off_cpu)
lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
if (!wq_topo_initialized)
return;
if (off_cpu >= 0 && !cpumask_test_cpu(off_cpu, effective))
off_cpu = -1;
......@@ -4356,6 +4361,7 @@ static void free_node_nr_active(struct wq_node_nr_active **nna_ar)
static void init_node_nr_active(struct wq_node_nr_active *nna)
{
nna->max = WQ_DFL_MIN_ACTIVE;
atomic_set(&nna->nr, 0);
raw_spin_lock_init(&nna->lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nna->pending_pwqs);
......@@ -7400,6 +7406,8 @@ void __init workqueue_init_topology(void)
init_pod_type(&wq_pod_types[WQ_AFFN_CACHE], cpus_share_cache);
init_pod_type(&wq_pod_types[WQ_AFFN_NUMA], cpus_share_numa);
wq_topo_initialized = true;
mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment