Commit c5ff46d6 authored by Michael Ellerman's avatar Michael Ellerman

powerpc: Add ppc_inst_next()

In a few places we want to calculate the address of the next
instruction. Previously that was simple, we just added 4 bytes, or if
using a u32 * we incremented that pointer by 1.

But prefixed instructions make it more complicated, we need to advance
by either 4 or 8 bytes depending on the actual instruction. We also
can't do pointer arithmetic using struct ppc_inst, because it is
always 8 bytes in size on 64-bit, even though we might only need to
advance by 4 bytes.

So add a ppc_inst_next() helper which calculates the location of the
next instruction, if the given instruction was located at the given
address. Note the instruction doesn't need to actually be at the
address in memory.

Although it would seem natural for the value to be passed by value,
that makes it too easy to write a loop that will read off the end of a
page, eg:

	for (; src < end; src = ppc_inst_next(src, *src),
			  dest = ppc_inst_next(dest, *dest))

As noticed by Christophe and Jordan, if end is the exact end of a
page, and the next page is not mapped, this will fault, because *dest
will read 8 bytes, 4 bytes into the next page.

So value is passed by reference, so the helper can be careful to use
ppc_inst_read() on it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200522133318.1681406-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
parent baddc87d
......@@ -100,6 +100,19 @@ static inline int ppc_inst_len(struct ppc_inst x)
return ppc_inst_prefixed(x) ? 8 : 4;
}
/*
* Return the address of the next instruction, if the instruction @value was
* located at @location.
*/
static inline struct ppc_inst *ppc_inst_next(void *location, struct ppc_inst *value)
{
struct ppc_inst tmp;
tmp = ppc_inst_read(value);
return location + ppc_inst_len(tmp);
}
int probe_user_read_inst(struct ppc_inst *inst,
struct ppc_inst __user *nip);
......
......@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ int arch_uprobe_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
* support doesn't exist and have to fix-up the next instruction
* to be executed.
*/
regs->nip = utask->vaddr + ppc_inst_len(ppc_inst_read(&auprobe->insn));
regs->nip = (unsigned long)ppc_inst_next((void *)utask->vaddr, &auprobe->insn);
user_disable_single_step(current);
return 0;
......
......@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static int patch_alt_instruction(struct ppc_inst *src, struct ppc_inst *dest,
static int patch_feature_section(unsigned long value, struct fixup_entry *fcur)
{
struct ppc_inst *start, *end, *alt_start, *alt_end, *src, *dest;
struct ppc_inst *start, *end, *alt_start, *alt_end, *src, *dest, nop;
start = calc_addr(fcur, fcur->start_off);
end = calc_addr(fcur, fcur->end_off);
......@@ -84,14 +84,15 @@ static int patch_feature_section(unsigned long value, struct fixup_entry *fcur)
src = alt_start;
dest = start;
for (; src < alt_end; src = (void *)src + ppc_inst_len(ppc_inst_read(src)),
(dest = (void *)dest + ppc_inst_len(ppc_inst_read(dest)))) {
for (; src < alt_end; src = ppc_inst_next(src, src),
dest = ppc_inst_next(dest, dest)) {
if (patch_alt_instruction(src, dest, alt_start, alt_end))
return 1;
}
for (; dest < end; dest = (void *)dest + ppc_inst_len(ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP)))
raw_patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP));
nop = ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP);
for (; dest < end; dest = ppc_inst_next(dest, &nop))
raw_patch_instruction(dest, nop);
return 0;
}
......@@ -405,8 +406,8 @@ static void do_final_fixups(void)
while (src < end) {
inst = ppc_inst_read(src);
raw_patch_instruction(dest, inst);
src = (void *)src + ppc_inst_len(inst);
dest = (void *)dest + ppc_inst_len(inst);
src = ppc_inst_next(src, src);
dest = ppc_inst_next(dest, dest);
}
#endif
}
......
......@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ static void insert_bpts(void)
}
patch_instruction(bp->instr, instr);
patch_instruction((void *)bp->instr + ppc_inst_len(instr),
patch_instruction(ppc_inst_next(bp->instr, &instr),
ppc_inst(bpinstr));
if (bp->enabled & BP_CIABR)
continue;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment