PCI: Revert the cfg_access_lock lockdep mechanism
While the experiment did reveal that there are additional places that are missing the lock during secondary bus reset, one of the places that needs to take cfg_access_lock (pci_bus_lock()) is not prepared for lockdep annotation. Specifically, pci_bus_lock() takes pci_dev_lock() recursively and is currently dependent on the fact that the device_lock() is marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class(&dev->mutex). Otherwise, without that annotation, pci_bus_lock() would need to use something like a new pci_dev_lock_nested() helper, a scheme to track a PCI device's depth in the topology, and a hope that the depth of a PCI tree never exceeds the max value for a lockdep subclass. The alternative to ripping out the lockdep coverage would be to deploy a dynamic lock key for every PCI device. Unfortunately, there is evidence that increasing the number of keys that lockdep needs to track to be per-PCI-device is prohibitively expensive for something like the cfg_access_lock. The main motivation for adding the annotation in the first place was to catch unlocked secondary bus resets, not necessarily catch lock ordering problems between cfg_access_lock and other locks. Solve that narrower problem with follow-on patches, and just due to targeted revert for now. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/171711746402.1628941.14575335981264103013.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com Fixes: 7e89efc6 ("PCI: Lock upstream bridge for pci_reset_function()") Reported-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Closes: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_134186v1/shard-dg2-1/igt@device_reset@unbind-reset-rebind.htmlSigned-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Tested-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment