jbd2: fix incorrect unlock on j_list_lock

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637510

commit 559cce69 upstream.

When 'jh->b_transaction == transaction' (asserted by below)

  J_ASSERT_JH(jh, (jh->b_transaction == transaction || ...

'journal->j_list_lock' will be incorrectly unlocked, since
the the lock is aquired only at the end of if / else-if
statements (missing the else case).
Signed-off-by: Taesoo Kim <tsgatesv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Fixes: 6e4862a5Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>

fs/jbd2/transaction.c

@@ -1156,6 +1156,7 @@ int jbd2_journal_get_create_access(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
 		JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "file as BJ_Reserved");
 		spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 		__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction, BJ_Reserved);
+		spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 	} else if (jh->b_transaction == journal->j_committing_transaction) {
 		/* first access by this transaction */
 		jh->b_modified = 0;
@@ -1163,8 +1164,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_get_create_access(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
 		JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "set next transaction");
 		spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 		jh->b_next_transaction = transaction;
+		spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 	jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
 
 	/*