Commit cc7b8f62 authored by Mauricio Faria de Oliveira's avatar Mauricio Faria de Oliveira Committed by Linus Torvalds

mm/page-writeback.c: write_cache_pages(): deduplicate identical checks

There used to be a 'retry' label in between the two (identical) checks
when first introduced in commit f446daae ("mm: implement writeback
livelock avoidance using page tagging"), and later modified/updated in
commit 6e6938b6 ("writeback: introduce .tagged_writepages for the
WB_SYNC_NONE sync stage").

The label has been removed in commit 64081362 ("mm/page-writeback.c:
fix range_cyclic writeback vs writepages deadlock"), and the (identical)
checks are now present / performed immediately one after another.

So, remove/deduplicate the latter check, moving tag_pages_for_writeback()
into the former check before the 'tag' variable assignment, so it's clear
that it's not used in this (similarly-named) function call but only later
in pagevec_lookup_range_tag().
Signed-off-by: default avatarMauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarIra Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200218221716.1648-1-mfo@canonical.comSigned-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 5c72feee
......@@ -2182,12 +2182,12 @@ int write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
if (wbc->range_start == 0 && wbc->range_end == LLONG_MAX)
range_whole = 1;
}
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_writepages)
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_writepages) {
tag_pages_for_writeback(mapping, index, end);
tag = PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE;
else
} else {
tag = PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY;
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_writepages)
tag_pages_for_writeback(mapping, index, end);
}
done_index = index;
while (!done && (index <= end)) {
int i;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment