Commit ce09036e authored by Zhang Yi's avatar Zhang Yi Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: make extent status types exclusive

Since we don't add delayed flag in unwritten extents, all of the four
extent status types EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN, EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN,
EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED and EXTENT_STATUS_HOLE are exclusive now, add
assertion when storing pblock before inserting extent into status tree
and add comment to the status definition.
Suggested-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarZhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240813123452.2824659-11-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
parent 3b4ba269
......@@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ enum {
#define ES_SHIFT (sizeof(ext4_fsblk_t)*8 - ES_FLAGS)
#define ES_MASK (~((ext4_fsblk_t)0) << ES_SHIFT)
/*
* Besides EXTENT_STATUS_REFERENCED, all these extent type masks
* are exclusive, only one type can be set at a time.
*/
#define EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN (1 << ES_WRITTEN_B)
#define EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN (1 << ES_UNWRITTEN_B)
#define EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED (1 << ES_DELAYED_B)
......@@ -51,7 +55,9 @@ enum {
#define ES_TYPE_MASK ((ext4_fsblk_t)(EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN | \
EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN | \
EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED | \
EXTENT_STATUS_HOLE) << ES_SHIFT)
EXTENT_STATUS_HOLE))
#define ES_TYPE_VALID(type) ((type) && !((type) & ((type) - 1)))
struct ext4_sb_info;
struct ext4_extent;
......@@ -156,7 +162,7 @@ static inline unsigned int ext4_es_status(struct extent_status *es)
static inline unsigned int ext4_es_type(struct extent_status *es)
{
return (es->es_pblk & ES_TYPE_MASK) >> ES_SHIFT;
return (es->es_pblk >> ES_SHIFT) & ES_TYPE_MASK;
}
static inline int ext4_es_is_written(struct extent_status *es)
......@@ -228,6 +234,8 @@ static inline void ext4_es_store_pblock_status(struct extent_status *es,
ext4_fsblk_t pb,
unsigned int status)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(!ES_TYPE_VALID(status & ES_TYPE_MASK));
es->es_pblk = (((ext4_fsblk_t)status << ES_SHIFT) & ES_MASK) |
(pb & ~ES_MASK);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment