Commit ce3576eb authored by Uros Bizjak's avatar Uros Bizjak Committed by Ingo Molnar

locking/rtmutex: Use try_cmpxchg_relaxed() in mark_rt_mutex_waiters()

Use try_cmpxchg() instead of cmpxchg(*ptr, old, new) == old.

The x86 CMPXCHG instruction returns success in the ZF flag, so this change
saves a compare after CMPXCHG (and related move instruction in front of CMPXCHG).

Also, try_cmpxchg() implicitly assigns old *ptr value to "old" when CMPXCHG
fails. There is no need to re-read the value in the loop.

Note that the value from *ptr should be read using READ_ONCE() to prevent
the compiler from merging, refetching or reordering the read.

No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: default avatarUros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240124104953.612063-1-ubizjak@gmail.com
parent e807c2a3
...@@ -237,12 +237,13 @@ static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, ...@@ -237,12 +237,13 @@ static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
*/ */
static __always_inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) static __always_inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
{ {
unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner; unsigned long *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner;
unsigned long owner, new;
owner = READ_ONCE(*p);
do { do {
owner = *p; new = owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS;
} while (cmpxchg_relaxed(p, owner, } while (!try_cmpxchg_relaxed(p, &owner, new));
owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner);
/* /*
* The cmpxchg loop above is relaxed to avoid back-to-back ACQUIRE * The cmpxchg loop above is relaxed to avoid back-to-back ACQUIRE
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment