Commit cf4ff938 authored by Baokun Li's avatar Baokun Li Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: correct the judgment of BUG in ext4_mb_normalize_request

ext4_mb_normalize_request() can move logical start of allocated blocks
to reduce fragmentation and better utilize preallocation. However logical
block requested as a start of allocation (ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) should
always be covered by allocated blocks so we should check that by
modifying and to or in the assertion.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBaokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRitesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220528110017.354175-3-libaokun1@huawei.comSigned-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
parent a08f789d
...@@ -4185,7 +4185,22 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, ...@@ -4185,7 +4185,22 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
} }
rcu_read_unlock(); rcu_read_unlock();
if (start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical && /*
* In this function "start" and "size" are normalized for better
* alignment and length such that we could preallocate more blocks.
* This normalization is done such that original request of
* ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical & fe_len should always lie within "start" and
* "size" boundaries.
* (Note fe_len can be relaxed since FS block allocation API does not
* provide gurantee on number of contiguous blocks allocation since that
* depends upon free space left, etc).
* In case of inode pa, later we use the allocated blocks
* [pa_start + fe_logical - pa_lstart, fe_len/size] from the preallocated
* range of goal/best blocks [start, size] to put it at the
* ac_o_ex.fe_logical extent of this inode.
* (See ext4_mb_use_inode_pa() for more details)
*/
if (start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical ||
start > ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) { start > ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) {
ext4_msg(ac->ac_sb, KERN_ERR, ext4_msg(ac->ac_sb, KERN_ERR,
"start %lu, size %lu, fe_logical %lu", "start %lu, size %lu, fe_logical %lu",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment