Commit cf5bb023 authored by Leon Romanovsky's avatar Leon Romanovsky Committed by Saeed Mahameed

net/mlx5e: Don't delay release of hardware objects

XFRM core provides two callbacks to release resources, one is .xdo_dev_policy_delete()
and another is .xdo_dev_policy_free(). This separation allows delayed release so
"ip xfrm policy free" commands won't starve. Unfortunately, mlx5 command interface
can't run in .xdo_dev_policy_free() callbacks as the latter runs in ATOMIC context.

 BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/7/0/0x00000100
 Modules linked in: act_mirred act_tunnel_key cls_flower sch_ingress vxlan mlx5_vdpa vringh vhost_iotlb vdpa rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi ib_umad scsi_transport_iscsi rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xt_addrtype iptable_nat nf_nat br_netfilter rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss oid_registry overlay mlx5_core zram zsmalloc fuse
 CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 6.3.0+ #1
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <IRQ>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x50
  __schedule_bug+0x4e/0x60
  __schedule+0x5d5/0x780
  ? __mod_timer+0x286/0x3d0
  schedule+0x50/0x90
  schedule_timeout+0x7c/0xf0
  ? __bpf_trace_tick_stop+0x10/0x10
  __wait_for_common+0x88/0x190
  ? usleep_range_state+0x90/0x90
  cmd_exec+0x42e/0xb40 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5_cmd_do+0x1e/0x40 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5_cmd_exec+0x18/0x30 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5_cmd_delete_fte+0xa8/0xd0 [mlx5_core]
  del_hw_fte+0x60/0x120 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5_del_flow_rules+0xec/0x270 [mlx5_core]
  ? default_send_IPI_single_phys+0x26/0x30
  mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_del_pol+0x1a/0x60 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5e_xfrm_free_policy+0x15/0x20 [mlx5_core]
  xfrm_policy_destroy+0x5a/0xb0
  xfrm4_dst_destroy+0x7b/0x100
  dst_destroy+0x37/0x120
  rcu_core+0x2d6/0x540
  __do_softirq+0xcd/0x273
  irq_exit_rcu+0x82/0xb0
  sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x90
  </IRQ>
  <TASK>
  asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20
 RIP: 0010:default_idle+0x13/0x20
 Code: c0 08 00 00 00 4d 29 c8 4c 01 c7 4c 29 c2 e9 72 ff ff ff cc cc cc cc 8b 05 7a 4d ee 00 85 c0 7e 07 0f 00 2d 2f 98 2e 00 fb f4 <fa> c3 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 65 48 8b 04 25 40 b4 02 00
 RSP: 0018:ffff888100843ee0 EFLAGS: 00000242
 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff888100812b00 RCX: 4000000000000000
 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000083 RDI: 000000000002d2ec
 RBP: 0000000000000007 R08: 00000021daeded59 R09: 0000000000000001
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 000000000000000f R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
  default_idle_call+0x30/0xb0
  do_idle+0x1c1/0x1d0
  cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20
  start_secondary+0xfe/0x120
  secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xf3/0xfb
  </TASK>
 bad: scheduling from the idle thread!

Fixes: a5b8ca94 ("net/mlx5e: Add XFRM policy offload logic")
Signed-off-by: default avatarLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSimon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
parent 314ded53
......@@ -1040,11 +1040,17 @@ static int mlx5e_xfrm_add_policy(struct xfrm_policy *x,
return err;
}
static void mlx5e_xfrm_free_policy(struct xfrm_policy *x)
static void mlx5e_xfrm_del_policy(struct xfrm_policy *x)
{
struct mlx5e_ipsec_pol_entry *pol_entry = to_ipsec_pol_entry(x);
mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_del_pol(pol_entry);
}
static void mlx5e_xfrm_free_policy(struct xfrm_policy *x)
{
struct mlx5e_ipsec_pol_entry *pol_entry = to_ipsec_pol_entry(x);
kfree(pol_entry);
}
......@@ -1065,6 +1071,7 @@ static const struct xfrmdev_ops mlx5e_ipsec_packet_xfrmdev_ops = {
.xdo_dev_state_update_curlft = mlx5e_xfrm_update_curlft,
.xdo_dev_policy_add = mlx5e_xfrm_add_policy,
.xdo_dev_policy_delete = mlx5e_xfrm_del_policy,
.xdo_dev_policy_free = mlx5e_xfrm_free_policy,
};
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment