Commit d069ed28 authored by Petr Tesarik's avatar Petr Tesarik Committed by Christoph Hellwig

swiotlb: optimize get_max_slots()

Use a simple logical shift and increment to calculate the number of slots
taken by the DMA segment boundary.

At least GCC-13 is not able to optimize the expression, producing this
horrible assembly code on x86:

	cmpq	$-1, %rcx
	je	.L364
	addq	$2048, %rcx
	shrq	$11, %rcx
	movq	%rcx, %r13
.L331:
	// rest of the function here...

	// after function epilogue and return:
.L364:
	movabsq $9007199254740992, %r13
	jmp	.L331

After the optimization, the code looks more reasonable:

	shrq	$11, %r11
	leaq	1(%r11), %rbx
Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
parent f94cb36e
......@@ -903,9 +903,7 @@ static inline phys_addr_t slot_addr(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t idx)
*/
static inline unsigned long get_max_slots(unsigned long boundary_mask)
{
if (boundary_mask == ~0UL)
return 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - IO_TLB_SHIFT);
return nr_slots(boundary_mask + 1);
return (boundary_mask >> IO_TLB_SHIFT) + 1;
}
static unsigned int wrap_area_index(struct io_tlb_pool *mem, unsigned int index)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment