Commit d0afde5f authored by Trond Myklebust's avatar Trond Myklebust

SUNRPC: Improve accuracy of socket ENOBUFS determination

The current code checks for whether or not the socket is in a writeable
state after we get an EAGAIN. That is racy, since we've dropped the
socket lock, so the amount of free buffer may have changed.

Instead, let's check whether the socket is writeable before we try to
write to it. If that was the case, we do expect the message to be at
least partially sent unless we're in a low memory situation.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
parent 2790a624
......@@ -806,13 +806,15 @@ static int xs_sock_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req)
return ret;
}
static int xs_stream_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req)
static int xs_stream_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req, bool vm_wait)
{
struct sock_xprt *transport =
container_of(req->rq_xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
struct sock *sk = transport->inet;
int ret = -EAGAIN;
if (vm_wait)
return -ENOBUFS;
lock_sock(sk);
if (!sk_stream_memory_free(sk))
ret = xs_nospace(req, transport);
......@@ -870,6 +872,7 @@ static int xs_local_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req)
struct msghdr msg = {
.msg_flags = XS_SENDMSG_FLAGS,
};
bool vm_wait;
unsigned int sent;
int status;
......@@ -882,15 +885,14 @@ static int xs_local_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req)
xs_pktdump("packet data:",
req->rq_svec->iov_base, req->rq_svec->iov_len);
vm_wait = sk_stream_is_writeable(transport->inet) ? true : false;
req->rq_xtime = ktime_get();
status = xprt_sock_sendmsg(transport->sock, &msg, xdr,
transport->xmit.offset, rm, &sent);
dprintk("RPC: %s(%u) = %d\n",
__func__, xdr->len - transport->xmit.offset, status);
if (status == -EAGAIN && sock_writeable(transport->inet))
status = -ENOBUFS;
if (likely(sent > 0) || status == 0) {
transport->xmit.offset += sent;
req->rq_bytes_sent = transport->xmit.offset;
......@@ -900,13 +902,12 @@ static int xs_local_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req)
return 0;
}
status = -EAGAIN;
vm_wait = false;
}
switch (status) {
case -ENOBUFS:
break;
case -EAGAIN:
status = xs_stream_nospace(req);
status = xs_stream_nospace(req, vm_wait);
break;
default:
dprintk("RPC: sendmsg returned unrecognized error %d\n",
......@@ -1024,7 +1025,7 @@ static int xs_tcp_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req)
struct msghdr msg = {
.msg_flags = XS_SENDMSG_FLAGS,
};
bool vm_wait = false;
bool vm_wait;
unsigned int sent;
int status;
......@@ -1051,7 +1052,10 @@ static int xs_tcp_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req)
* called sendmsg(). */
req->rq_xtime = ktime_get();
tcp_sock_set_cork(transport->inet, true);
while (1) {
vm_wait = sk_stream_is_writeable(transport->inet) ? true : false;
do {
status = xprt_sock_sendmsg(transport->sock, &msg, xdr,
transport->xmit.offset, rm, &sent);
......@@ -1072,31 +1076,10 @@ static int xs_tcp_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req)
WARN_ON_ONCE(sent == 0 && status == 0);
if (status == -EAGAIN ) {
/*
* Return EAGAIN if we're sure we're hitting the
* socket send buffer limits.
*/
if (test_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &transport->sock->flags))
break;
/*
* Did we hit a memory allocation failure?
*/
if (sent == 0) {
status = -ENOBUFS;
if (vm_wait)
break;
/* Retry, knowing now that we're below the
* socket send buffer limit
*/
vm_wait = true;
}
continue;
}
if (status < 0)
break;
vm_wait = false;
}
if (sent > 0)
vm_wait = false;
} while (status == 0);
switch (status) {
case -ENOTSOCK:
......@@ -1104,7 +1087,7 @@ static int xs_tcp_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req)
/* Should we call xs_close() here? */
break;
case -EAGAIN:
status = xs_stream_nospace(req);
status = xs_stream_nospace(req, vm_wait);
break;
case -ECONNRESET:
case -ECONNREFUSED:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment