Commit d197e692 authored by Robert P. J. Day's avatar Robert P. J. Day Committed by Martin Schwidefsky

[S390] vmcp cleanup

No need to use the "&" prefix and, since you're calling nonseekable_open(),
there is no need to use no_llseek().
Signed-off-by: default avatarRobert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
parent 71780f59
...@@ -175,13 +175,12 @@ static long vmcp_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) ...@@ -175,13 +175,12 @@ static long vmcp_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
static const struct file_operations vmcp_fops = { static const struct file_operations vmcp_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE, .owner = THIS_MODULE,
.open = &vmcp_open, .open = vmcp_open,
.release = &vmcp_release, .release = vmcp_release,
.read = &vmcp_read, .read = vmcp_read,
.llseek = &no_llseek, .write = vmcp_write,
.write = &vmcp_write, .unlocked_ioctl = vmcp_ioctl,
.unlocked_ioctl = &vmcp_ioctl, .compat_ioctl = vmcp_ioctl
.compat_ioctl = &vmcp_ioctl
}; };
static struct miscdevice vmcp_dev = { static struct miscdevice vmcp_dev = {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment