Commit d38c692f authored by Sumanth Korikkar's avatar Sumanth Korikkar Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf bpf: Fix bpf prologue generation

Issue:

bpf_probe_read() is no longer available for architecture which has
overlapping address space. Hence bpf prologue generation fails

Fix:

Use bpf_probe_read_kernel for kernel member access. For user attribute
access in kprobes, use bpf_probe_read_user.

Other:

@user attribute was introduced in commit 1e032f7c ("perf-probe: Add
user memory access attribute support")

Test:

1. ulimit -l 128 ; ./perf record -e tests/bpf_sched_setscheduler.c
2. cat tests/bpf_sched_setscheduler.c

static void (*bpf_trace_printk)(const char *fmt, int fmt_size, ...) =
        (void *) 6;
static int (*bpf_probe_read_user)(void *dst, __u32 size,
                                  const void *unsafe_ptr) = (void *) 112;
static int (*bpf_probe_read_kernel)(void *dst, __u32 size,
        const void *unsafe_ptr) = (void *) 113;

SEC("func=do_sched_setscheduler  pid policy param->sched_priority@user")
int bpf_func__setscheduler(void *ctx, int err, pid_t pid, int policy,
                           int param)
{
        char fmt[] = "prio: %ld";
        bpf_trace_printk(fmt, sizeof(fmt), param);
        return 1;
}

char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
int _version SEC("version") = LINUX_VERSION_CODE;

3. ./perf script
   sched 305669 [000] 1614458.838675: perf_bpf_probe:func: (2904e508)
   pid=261614 policy=2 sched_priority=1

4. cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
   <...>-309956 [006] .... 1616098.093957: 0: prio: 1

Committer testing:

I had to add some missing headers in the bpf_sched_setscheduler.c test
proggie, then instead of using record+script I used 'perf trace' to
drive everything in one go:

  # cat bpf_sched_setscheduler.c
  #include <linux/types.h>
  #include <bpf.h>

  static void (*bpf_trace_printk)(const char *fmt, int fmt_size, ...) = (void *) 6;
  static int (*bpf_probe_read_user)(void *dst, __u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr) = (void *) 112;
  static int (*bpf_probe_read_kernel)(void *dst, __u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr) = (void *) 113;

  SEC("func=do_sched_setscheduler  pid policy param->sched_priority@user")
  int bpf_func__setscheduler(void *ctx, int err, pid_t pid, int policy, int param)
  {
          char fmt[] = "prio: %ld";
          bpf_trace_printk(fmt, sizeof(fmt), param);
          return 1;
  }

  char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
  int _version SEC("version") = LINUX_VERSION_CODE;
  #
  #
  # perf trace -e bpf_sched_setscheduler.c chrt -f 42 sleep 1
     0.000 chrt/80125 perf_bpf_probe:func(__probe_ip: -1676607808, policy: 1, sched_priority: 42)
  #

And even with backtraces :-)

  # perf trace -e bpf_sched_setscheduler.c/max-stack=8/ chrt -f 42 sleep 1
       0.000 chrt/79805 perf_bpf_probe:func(__probe_ip: -1676607808, policy: 1, sched_priority: 42)
                                         do_sched_setscheduler ([kernel.kallsyms])
                                         __x64_sys_sched_setscheduler ([kernel.kallsyms])
                                         do_syscall_64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
                                         entry_SYSCALL_64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
                                         __GI___sched_setscheduler (/usr/lib64/libc-2.30.so)
  #
Signed-off-by: default avatarSumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarThomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
LPU-Reference: 20200609081019.60234-3-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent 9256c303
...@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static int ...@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static int
gen_read_mem(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos, gen_read_mem(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos,
int src_base_addr_reg, int src_base_addr_reg,
int dst_addr_reg, int dst_addr_reg,
long offset) long offset,
int probeid)
{ {
/* mov arg3, src_base_addr_reg */ /* mov arg3, src_base_addr_reg */
if (src_base_addr_reg != BPF_REG_ARG3) if (src_base_addr_reg != BPF_REG_ARG3)
...@@ -159,7 +160,7 @@ gen_read_mem(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos, ...@@ -159,7 +160,7 @@ gen_read_mem(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos,
ins(BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG1, dst_addr_reg), pos); ins(BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG1, dst_addr_reg), pos);
/* Call probe_read */ /* Call probe_read */
ins(BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), pos); ins(BPF_EMIT_CALL(probeid), pos);
/* /*
* Error processing: if read fail, goto error code, * Error processing: if read fail, goto error code,
* will be relocated. Target should be the start of * will be relocated. Target should be the start of
...@@ -241,7 +242,7 @@ static int ...@@ -241,7 +242,7 @@ static int
gen_prologue_slowpath(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos, gen_prologue_slowpath(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos,
struct probe_trace_arg *args, int nargs) struct probe_trace_arg *args, int nargs)
{ {
int err, i; int err, i, probeid;
for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++) { for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++) {
struct probe_trace_arg *arg = &args[i]; struct probe_trace_arg *arg = &args[i];
...@@ -276,11 +277,16 @@ gen_prologue_slowpath(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos, ...@@ -276,11 +277,16 @@ gen_prologue_slowpath(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos,
stack_offset), pos); stack_offset), pos);
ref = arg->ref; ref = arg->ref;
probeid = BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel;
while (ref) { while (ref) {
pr_debug("prologue: arg %d: offset %ld\n", pr_debug("prologue: arg %d: offset %ld\n",
i, ref->offset); i, ref->offset);
if (ref->user_access)
probeid = BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user;
err = gen_read_mem(pos, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_7, err = gen_read_mem(pos, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_7,
ref->offset); ref->offset, probeid);
if (err) { if (err) {
pr_err("prologue: failed to generate probe_read function call\n"); pr_err("prologue: failed to generate probe_read function call\n");
goto errout; goto errout;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment