Commit d42b8dbe authored by Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo's avatar Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Committed by Shuah Khan

selftests/seccomp: allow clock_nanosleep instead of nanosleep

glibc 2.31 calls clock_nanosleep when its nanosleep function is used. So
the restart_syscall fails after that. In order to deal with it, we trace
clock_nanosleep and nanosleep. Then we check for either.

This works just fine on systems with both glibc 2.30 and glibc 2.31,
whereas it failed before on a system with glibc 2.31.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Acked-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarShuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 651e0d88
......@@ -2803,12 +2803,13 @@ TEST(syscall_restart)
offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)),
#ifdef __NR_sigreturn
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_sigreturn, 6, 0),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_sigreturn, 7, 0),
#endif
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_read, 5, 0),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_exit, 4, 0),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_rt_sigreturn, 3, 0),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_nanosleep, 4, 0),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_read, 6, 0),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_exit, 5, 0),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_rt_sigreturn, 4, 0),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_nanosleep, 5, 0),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_clock_nanosleep, 4, 0),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_restart_syscall, 4, 0),
/* Allow __NR_write for easy logging. */
......@@ -2895,7 +2896,8 @@ TEST(syscall_restart)
ASSERT_EQ(PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP, (status >> 16));
ASSERT_EQ(0, ptrace(PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG, child_pid, NULL, &msg));
ASSERT_EQ(0x100, msg);
EXPECT_EQ(__NR_nanosleep, get_syscall(_metadata, child_pid));
ret = get_syscall(_metadata, child_pid);
EXPECT_TRUE(ret == __NR_nanosleep || ret == __NR_clock_nanosleep);
/* Might as well check siginfo for sanity while we're here. */
ASSERT_EQ(0, ptrace(PTRACE_GETSIGINFO, child_pid, NULL, &info));
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment