UBIFS: replace seq_printf by seq_puts
Fix checkpatch warnings: "WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf" Andrew Morton wrote: " - puts is presumably faster - puts doesn't go rogue if you accidentally pass it a "%". - this patch actually made fs/ubifs/super.o 12 bytes smaller. Perhaps because seq_printf() is a varargs function, forcing the caller to pass args on the stack instead of in registers. " Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment