Commit d5465479 authored by Jiri Slaby's avatar Jiri Slaby Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

vt_ioctl: fix GIO_UNIMAP regression

In commit 5ba12787, we shuffled with the check of 'perm'. But my
brain somehow inverted the condition in 'do_unimap_ioctl' (I thought
it is ||, not &&), so GIO_UNIMAP stopped working completely.

Move the 'perm' checks back to do_unimap_ioctl and do them right again.
In fact, this reverts this part of code to the pre-5ba12787 state.
Except 'perm' is now a bool.

Fixes: 5ba12787 ("vt_ioctl: move perm checks level up")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: default avatarFabian Vogt <fvogt@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026055419.30518-1-jslaby@suse.czSigned-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 82e61c39
......@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ static int vt_io_fontreset(struct console_font_op *op)
}
static inline int do_unimap_ioctl(int cmd, struct unimapdesc __user *user_ud,
struct vc_data *vc)
bool perm, struct vc_data *vc)
{
struct unimapdesc tmp;
......@@ -557,9 +557,11 @@ static inline int do_unimap_ioctl(int cmd, struct unimapdesc __user *user_ud,
return -EFAULT;
switch (cmd) {
case PIO_UNIMAP:
if (!perm)
return -EPERM;
return con_set_unimap(vc, tmp.entry_ct, tmp.entries);
case GIO_UNIMAP:
if (fg_console != vc->vc_num)
if (!perm && fg_console != vc->vc_num)
return -EPERM;
return con_get_unimap(vc, tmp.entry_ct, &(user_ud->entry_ct),
tmp.entries);
......@@ -639,10 +641,7 @@ static int vt_io_ioctl(struct vc_data *vc, unsigned int cmd, void __user *up,
case PIO_UNIMAP:
case GIO_UNIMAP:
if (!perm)
return -EPERM;
return do_unimap_ioctl(cmd, up, vc);
return do_unimap_ioctl(cmd, up, perm, vc);
default:
return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment