Commit d65bd5ec authored by Heiko Carstens's avatar Heiko Carstens Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched: add missing arch_update_cpu_topology() call

arch_reinit_sched_domains() used to call arch_update_cpu_topology()
via arch_init_sched_domains(). This call got lost with
e761b772 ("cpu hotplug, sched: Introduce
cpu_active_map and redo sched domain managment (take 2)".

So we might end up with outdated and missing cpus in the cpu core
maps (architecture used to call arch_reinit_sched_domains if cpu
topology changed).

This adds a call to arch_update_cpu_topology in partition_sched_domains
which gets called whenever scheduling domains get updated. Which is
what is supposed to happen when cpu topology changes.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent ee79d1bd
......@@ -7774,17 +7774,21 @@ void partition_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_t *doms_new,
struct sched_domain_attr *dattr_new)
{
int i, j, n;
int new_topology;
mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
/* always unregister in case we don't destroy any domains */
unregister_sched_domain_sysctl();
/* Let architecture update cpu core mappings. */
new_topology = arch_update_cpu_topology();
n = doms_new ? ndoms_new : 0;
/* Destroy deleted domains */
for (i = 0; i < ndoms_cur; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < n; j++) {
for (j = 0; j < n && !new_topology; j++) {
if (cpus_equal(doms_cur[i], doms_new[j])
&& dattrs_equal(dattr_cur, i, dattr_new, j))
goto match1;
......@@ -7804,7 +7808,7 @@ void partition_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_t *doms_new,
/* Build new domains */
for (i = 0; i < ndoms_new; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < ndoms_cur; j++) {
for (j = 0; j < ndoms_cur && !new_topology; j++) {
if (cpus_equal(doms_new[i], doms_cur[j])
&& dattrs_equal(dattr_new, i, dattr_cur, j))
goto match2;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment