Commit d7c8c94d authored by Steve French's avatar Steve French

[CIFS] Fix slow oplock break response when mounts to different

servers have same tid and we try to match oplock break to wrong tid.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
parent 083d3a2c
......@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ extern int SendReceive2(const unsigned int /* xid */ , struct cifsSesInfo *,
int * /* type of buf returned */ , const int long_op);
extern int checkSMBhdr(struct smb_hdr *smb, __u16 mid);
extern int checkSMB(struct smb_hdr *smb, __u16 mid, int length);
extern int is_valid_oplock_break(struct smb_hdr *smb);
extern int is_valid_oplock_break(struct smb_hdr *smb, struct TCP_Server_Info *);
extern int is_size_safe_to_change(struct cifsInodeInfo *);
extern struct cifsFileInfo *find_writable_file(struct cifsInodeInfo *);
extern unsigned int smbCalcSize(struct smb_hdr *ptr);
......
......@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ cifs_demultiplex_thread(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
smallbuf = NULL;
}
wake_up_process(task_to_wake);
} else if ((is_valid_oplock_break(smb_buffer) == FALSE)
} else if ((is_valid_oplock_break(smb_buffer, server) == FALSE)
&& (isMultiRsp == FALSE)) {
cERROR(1, ("No task to wake, unknown frame rcvd!"));
cifs_dump_mem("Received Data is: ",(char *)smb_buffer,
......
......@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ checkSMB(struct smb_hdr *smb, __u16 mid, int length)
return 0;
}
int
is_valid_oplock_break(struct smb_hdr *buf)
is_valid_oplock_break(struct smb_hdr *buf, struct TCP_Server_Info *srv)
{
struct smb_com_lock_req * pSMB = (struct smb_com_lock_req *)buf;
struct list_head *tmp;
......@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ is_valid_oplock_break(struct smb_hdr *buf)
read_lock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
list_for_each(tmp, &GlobalTreeConnectionList) {
tcon = list_entry(tmp, struct cifsTconInfo, cifsConnectionList);
if (tcon->tid == buf->Tid) {
if ((tcon->tid == buf->Tid) && (srv == tcon->ses->server)) {
cifs_stats_inc(&tcon->num_oplock_brks);
list_for_each(tmp1,&tcon->openFileList){
netfile = list_entry(tmp1,struct cifsFileInfo,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment