Commit d8289c9e authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: Make the rps new_delay comparison more readable

Eliminate the weird inverted logic from the rps new_delay comparison.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent 80814ae4
...@@ -707,8 +707,8 @@ static void gen6_pm_rps_work(struct work_struct *work) ...@@ -707,8 +707,8 @@ static void gen6_pm_rps_work(struct work_struct *work)
/* sysfs frequency interfaces may have snuck in while servicing the /* sysfs frequency interfaces may have snuck in while servicing the
* interrupt * interrupt
*/ */
if (!(new_delay > dev_priv->rps.max_delay || if (new_delay >= dev_priv->rps.min_delay &&
new_delay < dev_priv->rps.min_delay)) { new_delay <= dev_priv->rps.max_delay) {
if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev)) if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev))
valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, new_delay); valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, new_delay);
else else
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment