Commit da0503aa authored by Dan Carpenter's avatar Dan Carpenter Committed by Linus Torvalds

epoll: remove unneeded variable in reverse_path_check()

We never use the length variable.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 02edc6fc
...@@ -1077,13 +1077,11 @@ static int reverse_path_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests) ...@@ -1077,13 +1077,11 @@ static int reverse_path_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
*/ */
static int reverse_path_check(void) static int reverse_path_check(void)
{ {
int length = 0;
int error = 0; int error = 0;
struct file *current_file; struct file *current_file;
/* let's call this for all tfiles */ /* let's call this for all tfiles */
list_for_each_entry(current_file, &tfile_check_list, f_tfile_llink) { list_for_each_entry(current_file, &tfile_check_list, f_tfile_llink) {
length++;
path_count_init(); path_count_init();
error = ep_call_nested(&poll_loop_ncalls, EP_MAX_NESTS, error = ep_call_nested(&poll_loop_ncalls, EP_MAX_NESTS,
reverse_path_check_proc, current_file, reverse_path_check_proc, current_file,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment