net/mlx5e: Again mutually exclude RX-FCS and RX-port-timestamp

Commit 1e662209 ("net/mlx5e: Update rx ring hw mtu upon each rx-fcs
flag change") seems to have accidentally inverted the logic added in
commit 0bc73ad4 ("net/mlx5e: Mutually exclude RX-FCS and
RX-port-timestamp").

The impact of this is a little unclear since it seems the FCS scattered
with RX-FCS is (usually?) correct regardless.

Fixes: 1e662209 ("net/mlx5e: Update rx ring hw mtu upon each rx-fcs flag change")
Tested-by: Charlotte Tan <charlotte@extrahop.com>
Reviewed-by: Charlotte Tan <charlotte@extrahop.com>
Cc: Adham Faris <afaris@nvidia.com>
Cc: Aya Levin <ayal@nvidia.com>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Cc: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Mortensen <will@extrahop.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006053706.514618-1-will@extrahop.comSigned-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c

@@ -3952,13 +3952,14 @@ static int set_feature_rx_fcs(struct net_device *netdev, bool enable)
 	struct mlx5e_channels *chs = &priv->channels;
 	struct mlx5e_params new_params;
 	int err;
+	bool rx_ts_over_crc = !enable;
 
 	mutex_lock(&priv->state_lock);
 
 	new_params = chs->params;
 	new_params.scatter_fcs_en = enable;
 	err = mlx5e_safe_switch_params(priv, &new_params, mlx5e_set_rx_port_ts_wrap,
-				       &new_params.scatter_fcs_en, true);
+				       &rx_ts_over_crc, true);
 	mutex_unlock(&priv->state_lock);
 	return err;
 }