Commit dbbcbb2d authored by Daniel Walker's avatar Daniel Walker Committed by Jeff Garzik

netdev: ehea: locking order correction

Nested locks always need to be taken in the same order.  This change factors
out the ehea_fw_handles.lock to make the locking order consistent.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: Christoph Raisch <raisch@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Klein <tklein@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
parent 9f71a568
...@@ -2567,14 +2567,14 @@ static int ehea_down(struct net_device *dev) ...@@ -2567,14 +2567,14 @@ static int ehea_down(struct net_device *dev)
if (port->state == EHEA_PORT_DOWN) if (port->state == EHEA_PORT_DOWN)
return 0; return 0;
mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
down(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock); down(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
ehea_drop_multicast_list(dev); ehea_drop_multicast_list(dev);
ehea_broadcast_reg_helper(port, H_DEREG_BCMC); ehea_broadcast_reg_helper(port, H_DEREG_BCMC);
ehea_free_interrupts(dev); ehea_free_interrupts(dev);
mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
port->state = EHEA_PORT_DOWN; port->state = EHEA_PORT_DOWN;
ehea_update_bcmc_registrations(); ehea_update_bcmc_registrations();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment