iommu/vt-d: Fix scatterlist offset handling
commit 29a90b70 upstream. The intel-iommu DMA ops fail to correctly handle scatterlists where sg->offset is greater than PAGE_SIZE - the IOVA allocation is computed appropriately based on the page-aligned portion of the offset, but the mapping is set up relative to sg->page, which means it fails to actually cover the whole buffer (and in the worst case doesn't cover it at all): (sg->dma_address + sg->dma_len) ----+ sg->dma_address ---------+ | iov_pfn------+ | | | | | v v v iova: a b c d e f |--------|--------|--------|--------|--------| <...calculated....> [_____mapped______] pfn: 0 1 2 3 4 5 |--------|--------|--------|--------|--------| ^ ^ ^ | | | sg->page ----+ | | sg->offset --------------+ | (sg->offset + sg->length) ----------+ As a result, the caller ends up overrunning the mapping into whatever lies beyond, which usually goes badly: [ 429.645492] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2 [ 429.650847] DMAR: [DMA Write] Request device [02:00.4] fault addr f2682000 ... Whilst this is a fairly rare occurrence, it can happen from the result of intermediate scatterlist processing such as scatterwalk_ffwd() in the crypto layer. Whilst that particular site could be fixed up, it still seems worthwhile to bring intel-iommu in line with other DMA API implementations in handling this robustly. To that end, fix the intel_map_sg() path to line up the mapping correctly (in units of MM pages rather than VT-d pages to match the aligned_nrpages() calculation) regardless of the offset, and use sg_phys() consistently for clarity. Reported-by: Harsh Jain <Harsh@chelsio.com> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Reviewed by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Tested by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment