Commit dc513a40 authored by Guillaume Nault's avatar Guillaume Nault Committed by David S. Miller

ipv4: Reject again rules with high DSCP values

Commit 563f8e97 ("ipv4: Stop taking ECN bits into account in
fib4-rules") replaced the validation test on frh->tos. While the new
test is stricter for ECN bits, it doesn't detect the use of high order
DSCP bits. This would be fine if IPv4 could properly handle them. But
currently, most IPv4 lookups are done with the three high DSCP bits
masked. Therefore, using these bits doesn't lead to the expected
result.

Let's reject such configurations again, so that nobody starts to
use and make any assumption about how the stack handles the three high
order DSCP bits in fib4 rules.

Fixes: 563f8e97 ("ipv4: Stop taking ECN bits into account in fib4-rules")
Signed-off-by: default avatarGuillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 4b0385bc
...@@ -231,6 +231,11 @@ static int fib4_rule_configure(struct fib_rule *rule, struct sk_buff *skb, ...@@ -231,6 +231,11 @@ static int fib4_rule_configure(struct fib_rule *rule, struct sk_buff *skb,
"Invalid dsfield (tos): ECN bits must be 0"); "Invalid dsfield (tos): ECN bits must be 0");
goto errout; goto errout;
} }
/* IPv4 currently doesn't handle high order DSCP bits correctly */
if (frh->tos & ~IPTOS_TOS_MASK) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid tos");
goto errout;
}
rule4->dscp = inet_dsfield_to_dscp(frh->tos); rule4->dscp = inet_dsfield_to_dscp(frh->tos);
/* split local/main if they are not already split */ /* split local/main if they are not already split */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment