Commit dd5c53b9 authored by Johannes Erdfelt's avatar Johannes Erdfelt Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[PATCH] uhci.c incorrect locking

This fixes a problem that I've not run into and is difficult to trigger,
but definately a bug. We locked urb->lock, when we meant u->lock. It also
cleans up the code a little to make it easier to understand and removes
an obsolete comment.
parent cf81f1c2
......@@ -1842,10 +1842,6 @@ static int uhci_fsbr_timeout(struct uhci *uhci, struct urb *urb)
uhci_dec_fsbr(uhci, urb);
/* There is a race with updating IOC in here, but it's not worth */
/* trying to fix since this is merely an optimization. The only */
/* time we'd lose is if the status of the packet got updated */
/* and we'd be turning on FSBR next frame anyway, so it's a wash */
urbp->fsbr_timeout = 1;
head = &urbp->td_list;
......@@ -2009,23 +2005,23 @@ static void rh_int_timer_do(unsigned long ptr)
tmp = head->next;
while (tmp != head) {
struct urb *u = list_entry(tmp, struct urb, urb_list);
struct urb_priv *urbp = (struct urb_priv *)u->hcpriv;
struct urb_priv *up = (struct urb_priv *)u->hcpriv;
tmp = tmp->next;
spin_lock(&urb->lock);
spin_lock(&u->lock);
/* Check if the FSBR timed out */
if (urbp->fsbr && !urbp->fsbr_timeout && time_after_eq(jiffies, urbp->fsbrtime + IDLE_TIMEOUT))
if (up->fsbr && !up->fsbr_timeout && time_after_eq(jiffies, up->fsbrtime + IDLE_TIMEOUT))
uhci_fsbr_timeout(uhci, u);
/* Check if the URB timed out */
if (u->timeout && time_after_eq(jiffies, urbp->inserttime + u->timeout)) {
if (u->timeout && time_after_eq(jiffies, up->inserttime + u->timeout)) {
list_del(&u->urb_list);
list_add_tail(&u->urb_list, &list);
}
spin_unlock(&urb->lock);
spin_unlock(&u->lock);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uhci->urb_list_lock, flags);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment