Commit de224b7c authored by Nikolay Borisov's avatar Nikolay Borisov Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: Remove redundant memory barriers around dio_private error status

Using any kind of memory barriers around atomic operations which have
a return value is redundant, since those operations themselves are
fully ordered. atomic_t.txt states:

    - RMW operations that have a return value are fully ordered;

    Fully ordered primitives are ordered against everything prior and
    everything subsequent. Therefore a fully ordered primitive is like
    having an smp_mb() before and an smp_mb() after the primitive.

Given this let's replace the extra memory barriers with comments.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 16db5758
No related merge requests found
......@@ -8322,13 +8322,13 @@ static void btrfs_end_dio_bio(struct bio *bio)
err = dip->subio_endio(dip->inode, btrfs_io_bio(bio), err);
if (err) {
dip->errors = 1;
/*
* before atomic variable goto zero, we must make sure
* dip->errors is perceived to be set.
* We want to perceive the errors flag being set before
* decrementing the reference count. We don't need a barrier
* since atomic operations with a return value are fully
* ordered as per atomic_t.txt
*/
smp_mb__before_atomic();
dip->errors = 1;
}
/* if there are more bios still pending for this dio, just exit */
......@@ -8516,10 +8516,11 @@ static int btrfs_submit_direct_hook(struct btrfs_dio_private *dip)
out_err:
dip->errors = 1;
/*
* before atomic variable goto zero, we must
* make sure dip->errors is perceived to be set.
* Before atomic variable goto zero, we must make sure dip->errors is
* perceived to be set. This ordering is ensured by the fact that an
* atomic operations with a return value are fully ordered as per
* atomic_t.txt
*/
smp_mb__before_atomic();
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&dip->pending_bios))
bio_io_error(dip->orig_bio);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment