Commit df9024a8 authored by Dave Hansen's avatar Dave Hansen Committed by Linus Torvalds

mm: shrinker: add nid to tracepoint output

Now that we are doing NUMA-aware shrinking, and can have shrinkers
running in parallel, or working on individual nodes, it seems like we
should also be sticking the node in the output.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 7fe70475
......@@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_start,
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(struct shrinker *, shr)
__field(void *, shrink)
__field(int, nid)
__field(long, nr_objects_to_shrink)
__field(gfp_t, gfp_flags)
__field(unsigned long, pgs_scanned)
......@@ -203,6 +204,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_start,
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->shr = shr;
__entry->shrink = shr->scan_objects;
__entry->nid = sc->nid;
__entry->nr_objects_to_shrink = nr_objects_to_shrink;
__entry->gfp_flags = sc->gfp_mask;
__entry->pgs_scanned = pgs_scanned;
......@@ -212,9 +214,10 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_start,
__entry->total_scan = total_scan;
),
TP_printk("%pF %p: objects to shrink %ld gfp_flags %s pgs_scanned %ld lru_pgs %ld cache items %ld delta %lld total_scan %ld",
TP_printk("%pF %p: nid: %d objects to shrink %ld gfp_flags %s pgs_scanned %ld lru_pgs %ld cache items %ld delta %lld total_scan %ld",
__entry->shrink,
__entry->shr,
__entry->nid,
__entry->nr_objects_to_shrink,
show_gfp_flags(__entry->gfp_flags),
__entry->pgs_scanned,
......@@ -225,13 +228,15 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_start,
);
TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_end,
TP_PROTO(struct shrinker *shr, int shrinker_retval,
TP_PROTO(struct shrinker *shr, int nid, int shrinker_retval,
long unused_scan_cnt, long new_scan_cnt, long total_scan),
TP_ARGS(shr, shrinker_retval, unused_scan_cnt, new_scan_cnt, total_scan),
TP_ARGS(shr, nid, shrinker_retval, unused_scan_cnt, new_scan_cnt,
total_scan),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(struct shrinker *, shr)
__field(int, nid)
__field(void *, shrink)
__field(long, unused_scan)
__field(long, new_scan)
......@@ -241,6 +246,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_end,
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->shr = shr;
__entry->nid = nid;
__entry->shrink = shr->scan_objects;
__entry->unused_scan = unused_scan_cnt;
__entry->new_scan = new_scan_cnt;
......@@ -248,9 +254,10 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_end,
__entry->total_scan = total_scan;
),
TP_printk("%pF %p: unused scan count %ld new scan count %ld total_scan %ld last shrinker return val %d",
TP_printk("%pF %p: nid: %d unused scan count %ld new scan count %ld total_scan %ld last shrinker return val %d",
__entry->shrink,
__entry->shr,
__entry->nid,
__entry->unused_scan,
__entry->new_scan,
__entry->total_scan,
......
......@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ shrink_slab_node(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, struct shrinker *shrinker,
else
new_nr = atomic_long_read(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]);
trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, freed, nr, new_nr, total_scan);
trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, nid, freed, nr, new_nr, total_scan);
return freed;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment