Commit dfd6f9ad authored by Arnd Bergmann's avatar Arnd Bergmann Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI: fix false-positive -Wuninitialized warning

clang gets confused by an uninitialized variable in what looks
to it like a never executed code path:

arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c:618:13: error: variable 'polarity' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
        polarity = polarity ? ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW : ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH;
                   ^~~~~~~~
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c:606:32: note: initialize the variable 'polarity' to silence this warning
        int rc, irq, trigger, polarity;
                                      ^
                                       = 0
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c:617:12: error: variable 'trigger' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
        trigger = trigger ? ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE : ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE;
                  ^~~~~~~
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c:606:22: note: initialize the variable 'trigger' to silence this warning
        int rc, irq, trigger, polarity;
                            ^
                             = 0

This is unfortunately a design decision in clang and won't be fixed.

Changing the acpi_get_override_irq() macro to an inline function
reliably avoids the issue.
Signed-off-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent b80d6a42
......@@ -324,7 +324,10 @@ struct irq_domain *acpi_irq_create_hierarchy(unsigned int flags,
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
extern int acpi_get_override_irq(u32 gsi, int *trigger, int *polarity);
#else
#define acpi_get_override_irq(gsi, trigger, polarity) (-1)
static inline int acpi_get_override_irq(u32 gsi, int *trigger, int *polarity)
{
return -1;
}
#endif
/*
* This function undoes the effect of one call to acpi_register_gsi().
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment